Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

The best reason to take vitamin D is when level is low

- Dr. Keith Roach Submit letters to To Your GoodHealth@med.cornell.edu or to 628 Virginia Dr., Orlando, FL 32803.

Dear Dr. Roach: When vitamin D is recommende­d, I need to be sure I am taking the right dose. When I took 5,000 IU daily, my blood calcium levels increased and my doctor said to cut back to 2,000 IU daily. Now I read that we should be taking 5,000 IU daily. Can vitamin D be harmful? — J.O.

Dear J.O.: During winter, most people north are unable to make adequate vitamin D, and low levels are common. However, studies have failed to show much benefit in supplement­ation of vitamin D, and should be used only for people with low vitamin D levels. People with risk factors for low vitamin D should be screened.

When levels are low, supplement­ation is appropriat­e.

Most experts use 600-2,000 IU for treatment. Toxicity due to excess vitamin D is unusual at dosages at or below 8,000 IU daily. Doses above 2,000 should be guided by measuremen­t of blood levels.

A high calcium level is an indicator of excess vitamin D. However, the fact that you had high calcium at modest levels of vitamin D replacemen­t makes me wonder if you also have a high level of parathyroi­d hormone. A high PTH level is the most common cause of persistent­ly high blood calcium levels. I would recommend you ask your doctor about checking your parathyroi­d hormone level.

Vitamin D treatment of people with COVID-19 has so far not been shown to be helpful. Studies are ongoing.

In absence of good data, I would not recommend more than routine supplement­ation to treat or prevent vitamin D deficiency, but a dose of 600-1,000 IU daily is unlikely to be harmful and may possibly help.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States