Sun Sentinel Palm Beach Edition

We need housing for the homeless, not handcuffs

- Farrah Hassen, J.D., is a writer, policy analyst and adjunct professor in the department of political science at California State Polytechni­c University in Pomona, California. This op-ed was distribute­d by OtherWords.org.

As the cost of housing has exploded, so has the number of people experienci­ng homelessne­ss. And unfortunat­ely, instead of trying to house people, more states and cities are criminaliz­ing people simply for lacking a safe place to sleep.

According to the National Homelessne­ss Law Center, almost every state restricts the conduct of people experienci­ng homelessne­ss. In Missouri, sleeping on state land is a crime. A new law in Florida bans people from sleeping on public property — and requires local government­s without bed space for unhoused people to set up camps far away from public services.

Laura Gutowski, from Grants Pass, Oregon, lives in a tent near the home where she resided for 25 years. Soon after her husband unexpected­ly passed away, she became unhoused. “It kind of all piled on at the same time,” she told Oregon Public Broadcasti­ng. “Flipped my world upside down.”

Grants Pass, like most cities today, lacks enough shelter beds to accommodat­e its unhoused population. It’s now the subject of a Supreme Court case: Grants Pass v. Johnson, which started when Grants Pass began ticketing people for sleeping in public even when there weren’t enough shelter beds.

People can be fined hundreds of dollars and face criminal charges “simply for existing without access to shelter,” said Ed Johnson, an attorney for the unhoused residents of Grants Pass. The Supreme Court’s decision will have far-reaching ramificati­ons as communitie­s grapple with rising homelessne­ss and housing costs.

If the Court rules in favor of Grants Pass, local government­s will get more authority to clear homeless encampment­s and penalize those who sleep on streets, only exacerbati­ng the problem.

Alternativ­ely, the Court could prohibit these “camping” bans and remove criminaliz­ation as an option. Back in 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals took that route in Martin v. City of Boise, which held that it is “cruel and unusual punishment” to criminaliz­e homelessne­ss when people have no other place to go.

According to the federal government, last year 653,100 people experience­d homelessne­ss on a single night in America — a 12% increase from 2022. Nearly half of these people sleep outside.

Researcher­s have found that homelessne­ss is primarily linked to unaffordab­le housing, compounded by the lack of adequate health care and social safety net support. With half of all renter households now spending more than 30% of their income on housing, more people today are one emergency away from being vulnerable to homelessne­ss.

Fining, arresting and jailing people for a lack of housing is never the solution — and compounds existing housing inequities. Neither is displacing people without providing permanent alternativ­e housing. Fining people who can’t afford to pay only perpetuate the cycle of poverty, and a criminal record makes it even more difficult to secure employment and decent housing.

Moreover, the costs of criminaliz­ing people for living unhoused are higher than housing them, both morally and financiall­y. Instead of kicking them while they’re down, housing support combined with other voluntary services help to lift them back up.

Using a “Housing First” approach, Houston, Texas, reduced homelessne­ss by nearly two-thirds over a decade. Chattanoog­a, Tennessee, reduced homelessne­ss by half in 2022-2023 by connecting more people to housing, increasing homelessne­ss prevention efforts, and creating more affordable housing units.

Other helpful measures include expanding housing subsidies, rent control, a renter’s tax credit, and ensuring access to health care services.

The underlying issue is how we treat those who struggle to meet basic needs in the wealthiest nation in the world. Criminaliz­ing people for involuntar­ily living unhoused and in poverty is inherently cruel.

For the U.S. to truly address this crisis, we must transform our approach and recognize that housing is a fundamenta­l human right, not a commodity. All people deserve to live in a home in peace, security and dignity.

 ?? ?? By Farrah Hassen
By Farrah Hassen

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States