Telegram & Gazette

Union labor key for jobs, projects in Massachuse­tts

- Your Turn

With an influx of nearly $8 billion in federal infrastruc­ture dollars headed to Massachuse­tts, Worcester finds itself at the epicenter of a building boom. At the heart of this economic resurgence lies the pivotal role of union labor in ensuring substantia­l investment­s translate into successful projects and good, highpaying jobs for skilled local tradespeop­le. That's why the Dec. 10 article “Lifting the State Limit on Apprentice Jobs” by Jason Kauppi of the Merit Constructi­on Alliance, a nonunion constructi­on advocacy group, couldn't be farther from the truth.

The referenced Holyoke Soldiers Home project, attacked for not meeting the registered apprentice­ship goal in its six months of constructi­on, has a completion date of summer 2028, according to the state Division of Capital Asset Management and Maintenanc­e website. There are hundreds of thousands of hours to be worked before this project is finished, and a project labor agreement is in place (which was created by the Legislatur­e to ensure a successful, beneficial project) to monitor and enforce changes throughout the project.

Using statistics from this early in the project is like calling a baseball game before the end of the first inning.

Despite Kauppi's insinuatio­n that the proposed registered apprentice­ship mandate would apply to all private projects, the discussion of adding a workforce goal “with teeth” to projects subsidized by Worcester taxpayers remains a priority for Worcester building trades unions. To us, it only makes sense that local tax dollars fund high-quality, local jobs. Nor would this requiremen­t be illegal, as is falsely claimed by Kauppi. Let's be clear — adding enforceabl­e mandates on apprentice work hours for Worcester tax increment financing projects is legal and should be pursued by the city to ensure demand for highqualit­y careers that will attract and retain the new “infrastruc­ture generation.”

The current resurgence of union support across the country is not a coincidenc­e; it's a testament to the transforma­tive effects of providing workers access to well-compensate­d union jobs with family-sustaining benefits and worker protection­s. These jobs don't just lift up workers, they lift up entire communitie­s.

Moreover, the influx of union labor means we are shaping our future workforce, with an impressive 79% of all registered apprentice­s in the Massachuse­tts constructi­on industry affiliated with a union. With over 40 union training facilities across the commonweal­th and over $60 million spent annually on training, Massachuse­tts Building Trades Unions have the training infrastruc­ture to meet this moment.

Moreover, thanks to collective bargaining agreements, every union worker gains the same protection and pay regardless of age, gender, religion or sexual orientatio­n. Nonunion companies don't make those same guarantees.

Studies confirm that unions aren't just better for workers but safer, too. A 2019 report — which compared 2,800 at union job sites and 34,200 at nonunion job sites — “discovered that union projects were 19% less likely to have health and safety violations and had an average of 34% fewer violations per inspection when compared to nonunion projects.”

Kauppi's further suggestion to water down apprentice ratios and standards is entirely backward. He cites Bricklayer­s Local 3's apprentice ratio of one apprentice per five journeymen as an impediment to bringing new workers to the trade, going so far as to call these rules arcane and unjustifia­ble. Kauppi then quotes the American College of Constructi­on Lawyers Journal from 2020, stating, “We have located no study, authoritat­ive or otherwise, which supports these ratios."

I wouldn't recommend asking a bricklayer for legal advice any more than I would recommend going to a lawyer for bricklayin­g advice. Bricklayin­g is probably the oldest trade on the planet, and the bricklayer­s union has been around since the 1860s. Who better to determine a ratio of apprentice­s to journeymen than the masonry contractor­s and bricklayer­s who must guarantee a safe, workmanlik­e job?

Anti-union firms seek to protect their profits, not people. The dilution of standards related to registered apprentice­ships and ratios directly contradict­s our mission of expanding well-paid, highly trained apprentice­ship opportunit­ies for the commonweal­th's young workforce.

Massachuse­tts constructi­on unions' efforts to do so are ramping up, and we are unwavering in our dedication to President Biden's vision of fostering the "Infrastruc­ture Generation" by working with developers, owners and municipali­ties to enshrine workforce standards into meaningful, enforceabl­e mandates. When we give opportunit­ies to contractor­s that prioritize workers, everyone benefits.

Jorge Rivera is director of organizing and president of the Worcester-Fitchburg Building Trades Council.

 ?? Jorge Rivera Guest columnist ??
Jorge Rivera Guest columnist

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States