Texarkana Gazette

POLITICAL POTHOLES

Toll roads face tax and increased traffic challenges in Texas

- By Dug Begley

HOUSTON—The political tide has turned against toll roads in Texas, imperiling a Tomball interchang­e project and hamstringi­ng frustrated local officials, while setting an ominous tone for projects to come.

The Houston Chronicle reports for years, state officials relied on tolls to tackle some of Texas’ biggest traffic messes as a way to build without adding taxes. Since 2016, however, Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick have taken hard-line stances against the mixing of Texas Department of Transporta­tion money and toll revenues.

That’s caught up with the plan for direct ramps from Texas 249 to the Grand Parkway, and it has drawn ire from Houston-area officials who think Austin politician­s are taking their toll takedown too far.

“We are bending to blackmail,” Fort Bend County Commission­er James Patterson charged last month.

The continued sidelining of toll projects could drasticall­y alter how many local projects are built, and how quickly relief from heavy congestion comes for drivers. With tolls, supporters say, many projects can be built years in advance. Without them, even with new state funding, work could wait years.

Much of the current divide stems from 2014 and 2015, when voters approved Propositio­ns 7 and 1, respective­ly. The referendum­s combined add up to $4 billion annually to highway spending by the TxDOT.

Lawmakers also ended diversions of about $600 million annually in state fuel tax funds to other uses, such as law enforcemen­t.

The money, funneled through the state’s transporta­tion plans, can be used only to relieve congestion, perform maintenanc­e or in specific cases lower the state’s debt related to highways. None of the money, about half the $70 billion Texas plans for roads over the next decade, can be used for transit or toll projects.

Abbott and others touted the increased spending as relief from pay lanes. They’re now taking a strict view of the no-toll pledge, spiking projects that use tolls, including managed lanes in Austin and Dallas designed to encourage carpool use but available to solo drivers for a price.

“Texas is spending record amounts on transporta­tion,” Patrick wrote to Texas Transporta­tion Commission chairman Bruce Bugg in November. “TxDOT’s proposal to add managed toll lanes is simply not consistent with the policies set forth by the legislatur­e.”

Use of tolls is nothing new for Texas’ major urban areas, but their proliferat­ion irritated some who felt TxDOT’s plans simply made taxpayers give up their money in a different way.

That’s led to widespread aversion to toll projects, said state Sen. Paul Bettencour­t, R-Houston.

“There is a reason for it and we have to recognize the obvious,” Bettencour­t said. “People feel they are paying for something, then asked to pay again.”

So far, the hard line on tolls has affected only the Tomballare­a project, which is not set for constructi­on until fiscal 2019. Its inclusion in a list of local projects, however, held up local approvals for months. The HoustonGal­veston Area Council’ s Transporta­tion Policy Council the regional group responsibl­e for local transporta­tion planning relented only last month and removed the project from its list.

“We have essentiall­y put it to the side for a moment,” said Alan Clark, manager of transporta­tion and air quality programs for the regional council.

Clark said not doing so would have put other projects, some of which are expected to start before the Grand Parkway and Texas 249 work, at risk.

As officials approved shelving the interchang­e ramps, Patterson lashed out at Patrick and others, arguing they were taking too strict an approach and interferin­g in projects that don’t directly involve state funds. The Texas 249 work is being paid for by the Harris County Toll Road Authority and TxDOT, though the state’s share isn’t from state funds. It comes from the Grand Parkway Transporta­tion Corp., the entity building Houston’s outer ring road.

“We are calling it a TxDOT project when I do not believe it is a TxDOT project,” Patterson said.

TxDOT officials in Houston, meanwhile, have carefully avoided some of the discussion in recent months, notably regarding the planned overhaul and redesign of Interstate 45 through downtown. The $7 billion freeway redo from Interstate 69 to the Sam Houston Tollway along I-45 includes so-called MaX Lanes that officials said allow for greater use of carpools and transit.

Plans for the freeway project initially labeled them as managed lanes, and left open the potential for a tolling component for solo drivers. Since mid-2017, officials have said no decision on tolling, or not tolling, has been made, citing the possibilit­y of additional state funding from Propositio­ns 1 or 7.

In Dallas and Austin, officials continue fighting for their projects, removed at Patrick’s urging from state plans. Leaders in Lake Highlands, a neighborho­od in northeast Dallas, joined city officials in a plea to transporta­tion commission­ers to revive plans for managed lanes along Interstate 635.

The lanes would operate similarly to the Katy Managed Lanes along Interstate 10, which offer free use for carpools and charge solo drivers for a quicker trip.

“There is a big difference between a toll road and an optional managed lane for congestion relief,” Dallas resident Susan Morgan told commission­ers last month.

For Lake Highlands residents, the decision to hold up the project over tolls leaves them with nothing in terms of traffic relief.

It’s a considerat­ion that worries even some of the critics of toll roads, including state Sen. Bob Hall, R-Edgewood, who represents a sliver of Lake Highlands.

“We have delayed this project long enough,” Hall said.

A long list of projects are waiting for state money, and despite billions in additional investment over the next decade, it still isn’t enough to address the most persistent problem spots.

Bugg, as a discussion exercise, asked TxDOT officials to analyze what could be accomplish­ed by directing all the new congestion relief money—$35.4 billion of the state’s $70.6 billion spending plan—to the 100 most congested road segments in the state.

The reality is the worst spots in the state would gobble up all Texas’ transporta­tion funding, according to the TxDOT analysis.

The top 100 list compiled annually by Texas A&M Transporta­tion Institute is based on total delay times along the roadways.

On the current list, 92 of the most congested segments are in five metro areas—Houston, Dallas, Austin, San Antonio and Fort Worth—with 38 of those in the Houston area.

The five areas have all of the top 50 most congested roads, topped by some familiar stretches, such as Loop 610 in Uptown, Interstate 35 in downtown Austin and Interstate 69 from the Loop 610 to downtown Houston.

TxDOT estimated costs using current and future plans and programs. Tackling the top 25 most congested roads in the state— which includes 12 in the Houston area—would cost $27.7 billion, while the next 25 segments would cost $10.7 billion.

With many needs and still not enough revenues to promise everything to everyone, Bugg said transporta­tion officials still face challenges, even with more to spend.

“We are indifferen­t to the funding streams,” he said. “But not indifferen­t to our commitment to building roads.”

“There is a big difference between a toll road and an optional managed lane for congestion relief.” ——Dallas resident Susan Morgan

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States