Renaming Austin?

Silly suggestion is political correctness gone far too far

The idea of removing monuments related to the Confederacy—a reality in some places—has been taken to the extreme by some in the capital of the Lone Star State.

Austin is known as perhaps the least “Texan” of the state’s cities. Despite being named for “the father of Texas” it has it’s own vibe.

But maybe that will change. Not the vibe. The name.

A recent report from the Austin Equity Office says that “societal values are fluid, and they can be and are different today” and recommends renaming several streets and parks that had been christened in honor of individuals who were slave owners or had ties to the Confederacy.

The list includes the iconic Barton Springs, named after slave owner William Barton, known as the “Daniel Boone of Texas.”

But one recommendation really stands out. The idea that Austin itself is renamed because Stephen F. Austin was opposed to Mexico banning slavery in Texas and did not want freed slaves settling in the region.

The recommendation was listed as of secondary importance to be considered later. But it’s something that makes us wonder how anyone could have thought something like that was even worthy of consideration.

Rename Austin? Why not take Washington and Jefferson off the currency, tear down their monuments, rename every city and county that honors them?

Whatever Austin’s personal flaws, he was the pivotal figure in Texas independence. His name deserves to remain on the state’s capital city.

Aside from any other considerations, it’s simply not practical to change the city’s name. It would cost taxpayers, business owners and residents a combined millions of dollars and millions of hours to replace the name. Can you imagine the nightmare that would ensue?

Honestly, we doubt this will ever be given any serious consideration. At least we hope not.

But then again it’s Austin we’re talking about. At least for now.