Texarkana Gazette

Vatican, China make breakthrou­gh deal on bishop appointmen­ts

- By Frances D’Emilio Nicole Winfield in Vilnius, Lithuania; Xun Hou, Wayne Zhange and Gillian Wong in Beijing; Johnson Lai in Taipei and Paolo Santalucia in Rome contribute­d.

VATICAN CITY—The Vatican and China said Saturday they had signed a “provisiona­l agreement” over the appointmen­t of bishops, a breakthrou­gh on an issue that stymied diplomatic relations for decades and aggravated a split among Chinese Catholics.

The deal resolved one of the major sticking points in recent years, with the Vatican agreeing to accept seven bishops who were previously named by Beijing without the pope’s consent.

The developmen­t comes nearly seven decades after the Holy See and Beijing severed official relations. Beijing’s long-held insistence that it must approve bishop appointmen­ts in China had clashed with absolute papal authority to pick bishops.

With the status of the seven bishops now reconciled, the Vatican said all bishops in China are now in communion with Rome—even though the Catholic community in China is still split between Catholics who belong to the official Chinese church and those in the undergroun­d church who remain loyal to the pope.

“Pope Francis hopes that, with these decisions, a new process may begin that will allow the wounds of the past to be overcome, leading to the full communion of all Chinese Catholics,” a Vatican statement said.

Some Chinese Catholics have opposed such a deal, notably Hong Kong Cardinal Joseph Zen, who previously called it a sell-out of Chinese Catholics who refused to join the state Chinese Catholic Patriotic Associatio­n and who paid the price of remaining faithful to Rome years of persecutio­n.

“What is the message this communique conveys to the faithful in China? ‘Trust us! Accept the agreement!,’” Zen wrote. That, he said, was tantamount to the Chinese government telling Catholics to “Obey us! We are in agreement with your pope!’”

Vatican spokesman Greg Burke, speaking in Vilnius, Lithuania, where Pope Francis was visiting, indicated the accord would serve as a blueprint for future appointmen­ts of bishops, who lead the faithful in their dioceses.

Burke told reporters the aim of the accord “is not political but pastoral, allowing the faithful to have bishops who are in communion with Rome but at the same time recognized by Chinese authoritie­s.”

The Vatican’s No. 2 official indicated that the pope and Chinese authoritie­s would jointly approve new bishop appointmen­ts.

“What is required now is unity, is trust, and a new impetus: to have good pastors, recognized by the Successor of Peter (Pope Francis) and by the legitimate civil authoritie­s,” said Cardinal Pietro Parolin.

A Vatican official earlier this year said the deal allows the pope to effectivel­y veto future bishop names proposed by Beijing. That official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because diplomatic negotiatio­ns were involved, had described it as the best arrangemen­t the Holy See could achieve for now.

The deal’s provisiona­l nature left open the possibilit­y of improvemen­ts down the line.

The Vatican described the provisiona­l agreement as “the

during fruit of a gradual and reciprocal rapprochem­ent” following a “long process of careful negotiatio­n.”

While the agreement could help pave the way for formal diplomatic ties and possibly an eventual papal trip to China, it was also sure to anger Catholics who vigorously advocated for the Vatican to maintain a hard line on caring for the 12 million faithful in China. The accord was signed in Beijing during a meeting between China’s deputy minister for foreign affairs, Wang Chao, and the Vatican undersecre­tary for state relations, Monsignor Antoine Camilleri.

In Beijing, the Foreign Ministry said “China and the Vatican will continue to maintain communicat­ions and push forward the process of improving relations between the two sides.”

Yet even as China professed the desire for better relations with the Holy See, the deal was signed against a backdrop of a Chinese crackdown on religions.

In one glaring case of pro-Vatican Catholics in China, Bishop Guo Xijin, head of an undergroun­d diocese, was whisked away in March by government agents in the southern village of Saiqi. It wasn’t immediatel­y clear how the new accord affected him and others opposing Chinese authoritie­s.

“The question now is: What is going to happen to the bishops who are under house arrest?” said the Rev. Bernardo Cervellera, a Vatican-China expert and chief editor of the missionary news agency Asia News.

Cervellera noted that Shanghai’s undergroun­d bishop and others were under house arrest and some priests were imprisoned. He said about a year ago, about 10 priests were in prison in Hebei province near Beijing, but he didn’t know their current situation.

The Vatican “had to start a dialogue from a weak position, because China is very powerful and therefore dictated the rules of this dialogue,” Cervellera told the AP.

Under President Xi Jinping, China’s most powerful leader since Mao Zedong, faithful are seeing their freedoms shrink even as the country experience­s a religious revival. Experts and activists contend that as Xi is consolidat­ing power, he is waging the most systematic suppressio­n of Christiani­ty since the Chinese constituti­on allowed for religious freedom in 1982.

Xi is trying to infuse all of the religions in China with “Chinese characteri­stics” such as loyalty to the Communist Party.

As part of this drive, Islamic crescents and domes have been stripped from mosques and a campaign is underway to “re-educate” tens of thousands of Uighur Muslims. Tibetan children have been moved from Buddhist temples to schools and banned from religious activities during summer holidays, state-run media have reported.

The Vatican spokesman indicated there was still some ways to go for better relations between the Catholic Church and China.

“This is not the end of a process. It’s the beginning,” Burke said. “This has been about dialogue, patient listening on both sides even when people come from very different standpoint­s.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States