Texas senator defends securities law bill
AUSTIN—The wife of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said Tuesday that a bill she filed that would change state securities law “has literally nothing to do” with her husband facing criminal charges of defrauding investors, even as experts said the proposal appears to strike near the heart of his indictment.
Republican state Sen. Angela Paxton was elected in November, when Ken Paxton was re-elected as Texas’ top law enforcement officer. He won a second term despite his criminal indictment from 2015, when he was charged with two felony counts of securities fraud and failing to register as an investment adviser representative.
Angela Paxton’s bill would allow Texas entrepreneurs to test some financial products and services without a license. Asked if her husband never would have been charged under her legislation, Angela Paxton said, “That has literally nothing to do with why I filed the bill.”
“That may be hard for you to believe,” she said in an interview off the Senate chamber. “But that has nothing to do with the purpose of the bill. People in my district brought this bill to me.”
Ken Paxton has pleaded not guilty to accusations that he duped investors in a high-tech startup called Servergy Inc. several years before becoming attorney general. Prosecutors say Paxton failed to disclose he was being paid by Servergy while trying to lure investors to the company, but his attorneys contend he was under no obligation to do so. If convicted, Paxton faces 5 to 99 years in prison.
But whether Ken Paxton will ever face trial has become uncertain. The case has languished for more than a year over delays, a venue change and Paxton’s political allies challenging the taxpayer costs of the prosecution. Special prosecutors have threatened to quit if they’re not paid, and they recently lost a key ruling over what they say are more than $200,000 in unpaid bills.
Angela Paxton said she didn’t consult with her husband on drafting the bill— and defended proposing legislation would expand the powers of his office.
Under the framework of the bill, the Texas attorney general’s office would administer a “regulatory sandbox” that would be the one to decide exemptions to licensing and registration, an authority that experts say the office does not currently have.
“How many people am I? I’m one person. That’s why you have the legislative process,” Angela Paxton said. “There’s literally no bill that doesn’t affect you if you pass it. But, you know, it’s an interesting experience for me. I care about the policy and I trust the process to work out the bugs.”
Neal Newman, a law professor at Texas A&M University who specializes in securities law, said the bill appears to be close to the heart of why Ken Paxton was indicted.
Buck Wood, an Austin attorney and longtime ethics expert, said Angela Paxton shouldn’t vote on such a bill as a senator, let alone be the one proposing it.
“I haven’t seen anything like this before,” Wood said. “The thing that’s so outstanding about this is that she introduced it. The very activity she is legalizing here is what he got indicted over.”