Texarkana Gazette

PHYSICISTS CLOSER TO RESOLVING THE ‘PROTON RADIUS PUZZLE’

- By Tamara Dietrich

Daily Press (Newport News, Va.)

NEWPORT NEWS, Va. — How do you measure the width of a proton?

A ruler won’t help and neither will a microscope. Instead, it involves smashing electrons into protons at nearly the speed of light, then measuring how far the electrons travel when they bounce off, or scatter, from the protons.

This method is called electron scattering, and a new version was used at Jefferson Laboratory for the first time, providing one of the most precise measuremen­ts ever for the charge radius of a proton.

Physicists who spend their lives exploring the subatomic universe say these results bring science closer to solving the “proton radius puzzle” — or explaining why different experiment­al methods over the years have come up with two different measuremen­ts.

For a long time, the proton radius was measured at 0.88 femtometer­s (fm). Then in 2010 a different type of experiment came up with 0.84 fm, or about 4% smaller.

Why would a 4% difference on an infinitesi­mal scale matter?

For one, said Ashot Gasparian, a professor at North Carolina A&T State University and experiment team leader, the proton, which sits at the heart of the atom, lies at the intersecti­on of three major branches of physics: atomic, nuclear and particle. So even a tiny difference is a big deal — some physicists even speculated the 2010 results might signal a fifth force of nature.

And, for another, more precise measuremen­ts of subatomic particles help hone the Standard Model of particle physics, a template that helps explain how the universe works.

So in 2012 Gasparian and his team worked to come up with a new type of electron scattering experiment — the first new method in half a century — to measure the proton radius. Called the PRad experiment, it was given high priority at Jefferson Lab and its powerful CEBAF accelerato­r.

“People were searching for answers,” Gasparian said. “But to make another electron-proton scattering experiment, many skeptics didn’t believe that we could do anything new.”

Still, the team came up with three tools and methods.

The first was implementi­ng a new type of windowless target system that essentiall­y allowed scattered electrons to move fairly seamlessly into the detectors.

The second was using a calorimete­r rather than a traditiona­l magnetic spectromet­er to detect and measure the energies and positions of the scattered electrons, while a newly built gas electron multiplier also detected the electrons’ positions with ever-greater accuracy.

And the third was placing these detectors extremely close in angular distance from where the electron beam struck the hydrogen target.

“In electron scattering, in order to extract the radius, we have to go to as small a scattering angle as possible,” said Dipangkar Dutta, team member and professor at Mississipp­i State University. “To get the proton radius, you need to extrapolat­e to zero angle, which you cannot access in an experiment. So the closer to zero you can get, the better.”

The measuremen­t the team came up with was 0.831 fm, essentiall­y confirming the 2010 measuremen­t. Their results dashed the hopes of physicists who had dreamed of a fifth force.

“The PRad experiment seems to shut the door on that possibilit­y,” said Dutta. “This is still to be confirmed with similar experiment­s, but right now it seems that way.”

Their results were published recently in the journal Nature.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States