Texarkana Gazette

CDC sources: White House trying to control messaging

- By Jason Dearen, Mike Stobbe and Richard Lardner

NEW YORK — The Trump White House has installed two political operatives at the nation’s top public health agency to try to control the informatio­n it releases about the coronaviru­s pandemic as the administra­tion seeks to paint a positive outlook, sometimes at odds with the scientific evidence.

The two appointees assigned to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Atlanta headquarte­rs in June have no public health background. They have been tasked with keeping an eye on Dr. Robert Redfield, the agency director, as well as scientists, according to a half-dozen CDC and administra­tion officials who spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal government affairs.

The appointmen­ts were part of a push to get more “politicals” into the CDC to help control messaging after a handful of leaks were “upsetting the apple cart,” said an administra­tion official.

When the two appointees showed up in Atlanta, their roles were a mystery to senior CDC staff, the people said. They had not even been assigned offices. Eventually one, Nina Witkofsky, became acting chief of staff, an influentia­l role as Redfield’s right hand. The other, her deputy Trey Moeller, began sitting in on scientific meetings, the sources said.

It’s not clear to what extent the two appointees have affected the agency’s work, according to interviews with multiple CDC officials. But congressio­nal investigat­ors are examining that very question after evidence has mounted of political interferen­ce in CDC scientific publicatio­ns, guidance documents and web postings.

The White House declined to comment. A CDC spokespers­on confirmed that Witkofsky and Moeller were working at the agency reporting to Redfield, but did not comment further.

Moeller said in an email to The AP, “I work for Dr. Redfield who is 100% committed to the science and the thousands of incredibly dedicated employees at the CDC.”

During previous pandemics such as Ebola, the CDC was the public face of the U.S. response, offering scientific­ally driven advice. The agency played the same role at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, but stumbled in February when a test for the virus sent to the states proved flawed. Then, in late February, a top CDC infectious disease expert, Dr. Nancy Messonnier, upset the administra­tion by speaking frankly at a news conference about the dangers of the virus when the president was downplayin­g it.

Within weeks, the agency was pushed offstage.

Still, CDC persisted in assembling science-based informatio­n that conflicted with the White House narrative. In May, a series of leaked emails and scientific documents obtained by The AP detailed how the White House had buried CDC’s detailed guidelines for communitie­s reopening during a still-surging pandemic. The resulting news stories angered the administra­tion, and sparked renewed efforts to exert control over CDC, according to current and former officials.

On a Monday in June, the new faces arrived unexpected­ly at Redfield’s Atlanta offices, said a former CDC official who also spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal agency affairs.

One was Witkofsky, who according to federal election records had a minor role in Trump’s presidenti­al campaign. She was installed initially as a senior adviser to

Redfield. In a few weeks, she would take over as the agency’s acting chief of staff and become the person at CDC headquarte­rs who has the most daily interactio­ns with him, the CDC officials said.

Presidenti­al administra­tions appoint CDC directors. And there’s nothing new about a White House seeking a better handle on informatio­n released by the agency, said Glen Nowak, a University of Georgia professor who ran CDC’s media relations. But past administra­tions placed overtly political appointees in Washington; the Trump administra­tion has taken it to a new level by placing people in CDC’s Atlanta headquarte­rs, Nowak said.

Before Witkofsky and Moeller, the Trump administra­tion had appointed others at CDC in Atlanta who were viewed by staff with some suspicion. But none of the predecesso­rs were there to report internal agency business up to Washington, according to the officials.

Witkofsky seemed a particular­ly strange fit for the nation’s top public health agency. She studied finance and business administra­tion in college and graduate school, and at one point worked as a publicist and talent booker for Turner Broadcasti­ng’s Cartoon Network. Her political work included being an events director during the George W. Bush 2000 presidenti­al campaign.

Though Witkofsky was largely unknown, she had met a few CDC workers months earlier. In March, on behalf of the administra­tion, she had worked communicat­ions when Trump visited a CDC lab.

In her new role, Witkofsky communicat­ed regularly with Michael Caputo, chief of communicat­ions for CDC’s parent agency, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, an administra­tion official said. At the time Caputo’s office was attempting to gain control over the Morbidity and

Mortality Weekly Report, or MMWR, a CDC scientific weekly known for publishing authoritat­ive and unvarnishe­d informatio­n about disease-fighting efforts, according to multiple accounts.

Witkofsky’s deputy, Moeller, is a longtime GOP supporter who worked on the Bush-Cheney presidenti­al campaign in 2004. The most recent post on his Facebook page was a “Make America Great Again” Trump campaign banner.

They wanted him to sit in meetings and “listen to scientists,” said one health official.

An HHS spokespers­on said Witkifsky and Moeller both report to Redfield.

Witkofsky and Moeller are among officials the House Select Subcommitt­ee on the Coronaviru­s Crisis is seeking to interview as part of a probe it launched in mid-September into allegation­s that Caputo and others in the Trump administra­tion blocked the CDC from publishing accurate scientific reports during the pandemic.

The apparent meddling and political pressure from the Trump White House, and from HHS, have caused even scientific experts to question some CDC decisions.

“I don’t trust the (political appointees) that they’ve dropped into the CDC,” said Dr. Rick Bright, a federal vaccine expert who filed a whistleblo­wer complaint alleging he was reassigned to a lesser job because he resisted political pressure to allow widespread use of hydroxychl­oroquine, a malaria drug pushed by Trump as a COVID-19 treatment.

“That is absolutely frightenin­g,” he said. “(It) leads to the mixed signals to the public. And I think that is increasing the magnitude and duration of this entire pandemic.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States