Texarkana Gazette

Make your first home your last

The case for not moving up

- By Ron Lieber

Home has become work and school for millions of people. Many residences needed to somehow shift overnight to accommodat­e two workplaces and multiple classrooms because of the coronaviru­s. With schools and businesses signaling that these conditions will extend at least through the spring, it’s no surprise there is a stampede of people seeking more space. But when so many are acting on instinct, the best move may well be to slow down and ask some counterint­uitive questions.

Try this one on for size: Should the house you’re thinking of as a starter home be your forever home instead?

This is a tricky subject, like many of the biggest questions in personal finance, because of the complex stew of money and feelings that are involved.

First, the money. A home is an asset with a value that could make up a substantia­l proportion of your net worth. Hopefully, that value grows over time. And right now, with mortgage rates at record lows, it’s tempting to go as big as possible.

But there are other things you could do with any extra money that you might otherwise put toward a bigger or better home. That incrementa­l amount could go into retirement savings instead or a 529 college savings plan. Or you could give it away to people who don’t have the luxury of contemplat­ing these sorts of trade-offs.

The case for staying small need not be some scolding ode to parsimony. A more modest home can leave more money in the budget for travel, expensive hobbies, or a getaway abode by a lake or mountain. Living smaller also helps the environmen­t.

Now, those emotions. Spending more for a bigger dwelling doesn’t make sense unless there is a high psychic return on the extra space. But if you’ve never lived bigger, it’s hard to predict how much happier it will make you. And how do you weigh that qualitativ­e return against quantitati­ve trade-offs rendered in dollar figures?

There are some facts to keep in mind. Ever since the collapse in the housing market during the last big recession, the idea that your house is not, in fact, an investment vehicle has become common. Wise as this is, it doesn’t change the fact that a home is still an asset. And you should think hard about how any such asset might appreciate (or not) over time.

So much of any growth will depend on where you live, and too many of the these kinds of conversati­ons are framed around places like the San Francisco Bay Area, parts of Brooklyn, New York, or gentrifyin­g areas where there have been enormous gains in property values.

Nationally, however, the numbers aren’t so steep. Data from CoreLogic’s home-price index shows that over the past 20 years, the average increase for single-family homes priced at 125% or more of the median home price in their region is just 3.4% annually. For homes at the 75% to 100% level, the gain has been 4.3%.

Consider maintenanc­e costs, too. A newer home — say, less than 5 years old — might require just 1% of the purchase price in annual expenses, said John Bodrozic, a co-founder of HomeZada, a tool that helps owners keep track of costs and improvemen­ts.

But if your home is 25 years old or more, 4% is a better estimate. If history is any judge, putting money into stocks over periods measured in decades should yield a better return.

Good profession­als really can help determine what “return” ought to mean to you, though. Joe Chappius, a financial planner

in Buffalo, New York, suggested one basic strategy: Consult a few elders.

Find someone you trust who traded up 10 years ago, Chappius said. Very few of his clients who did so now think it was the best financial decision they ever made. More often, they have two rooms they rarely use.

A financial pro can also help you prioritize, including getting you and your spouse, if you have one, to agree on goals and dreams — and what’s worth sacrificin­g in the present to achieve all of the former and reach for some of the latter.

Once that baseline is set, they have specialize­d software that can make talking about the financial trade-offs easier. Chappius and Jeff Wolniewicz, partners in the firm Complete Wealth, walked me through their process this week using numbers that are typical for their home-seeking (or home-reaching) clients.

For any given trading-up transactio­n, a client might need to move $1,000 more per month to the housing budget. What might that mean right now? Perhaps it’s just a severe reduction in travel or eating out. But if money is already pretty tight, it could mean that no saving for a child’s college can even begin — and a $500 slug of monthly savings can ultimately pay for well over half of the cost of a state school.

“The thing about COVID is that it’s hopefully a short period, but it really puts a very fine point on the need for flexible spaces that can do double duty,” said Sarah Susanka, who has been preaching that gospel ever since 1998, when her book “The Not So Big House” came out. “It’s an acoustical issue.”

Danika Waddell, a financial planner in

Seattle, suggested another framing question: What might you regret if you stay small?

Get granular here and think beyond the pandemic, if you possibly can.

Is your love of hospitalit­y and large gatherings one that you would act on frequently? Hosting Sunday supper each week in a newly oversized great room can bring joy beyond measure.

But maybe you’re just letting your desire to host a few holidays each year dictate your feelings about a six-figure real estate decision.

If you’re a parent, are you fine with your house not being the place where the gang gathers? (Or would you actually rather not have teenagers hooking up in the basement guest room or smoking pot in the yard?)

And when relatives come to visit, will you regret having to put them up in a hotel? Maybe not! But if you want them around for an entire season each year, for many years to come, the bigger house could make sense if you are certain.

“The people who are generally the most happy are the ones who avoid the more, more, more and understand what is enough for them,” Wolniewicz said.

“That takes courage, to stand firm on what your enough is, especially if it’s in contrast to what the world says you should want more of.”

 ??  ?? ABOVE: Spending more for a bigger dwelling doesn’t make sense unless there is a high psychic return on the extra space. But if you’ve never lived bigger, it’s hard to predict how much happier it will
make you.
ABOVE: Spending more for a bigger dwelling doesn’t make sense unless there is a high psychic return on the extra space. But if you’ve never lived bigger, it’s hard to predict how much happier it will make you.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States