Texarkana Gazette

Tribes dispute reservatio­n where a $1B casino is planned

-

BOSTON — A rift is widening between Native American groups in New England over who has claim to scores of acres south of Boston where one tribe has been trying for years to build a $1 billion casino.

The recently revived Mattakeese­t Massachuse­t Tribe argues it’s the rightful heir to the land in Taunton set aside by the federal government for the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, which is planning to build a hotel, casino and entertainm­ent complex.

The Mattakeese­ts want the Mashpees and state and local authoritie­s to recognize their land claim, which they base on colonial-era documents.

“They blatantly fooled the whole entire country about this land belonging to them,” said Larry Fisher, who has been working to revive the tribe since becoming its chief sachem in 2014, of the Mashpees. “We just want the truth to be told. It belongs to us. The Mattakeese­ts.”

The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, which famously traces its ancestry to the Native Americans who shared a fall harvest with the Pilgrims 400 years ago, counter that Fisher’s group is just a smaller band within the broader Wampanoag people who have inhabited Massachuse­tts for thousands of years.

The Mattakeese­t Tribe currently has a few hundred members, according to Fisher, but does not have federal recognitio­n or a land base like the Mashpee Tribe, which was federally recognized in 2007 and has roughly 3,000-members.

“Larry is well-meaning but very confused,” said Steven Peters, the Mashpee Tribe’s spokesman. “The Mattakeese­ts and the Massachuse­ts are Wampanoags.”

The dustup is the latest wrinkle in the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe’s tortured, years-long quest for federally protected land — and the lucrative rights to build a tax-exempt casino on it.

The Cape Cod-based tribe was granted a more than 300acre reservatio­n in the waning months of the Obama administra­tion in 2016, but the Trump administra­tion moved to revoke the reservatio­n in what the tribe and its supporters complained was a dangerous precedent. A federal judge in June halted the move; the Interior Department has appealed.

Meanwhile, the tribe’s prominent, longtime chairman was arrested last month on federal bribery charges in connection with the casino project. Cedric Cromwell has denied the allegation­s, but has been ousted as chairman by tribe leaders.

Fisher, a 33-year-old Bostonarea substance abuse counselor, said his tribe has no quarrel with the half of the tribe's roughly 300-acre reservatio­n that's located in the town of Mashpee on Cape Cod, where the tribe has operated a government center and other tribe services for years.

But he contends the Taunton-area half, located some 50 miles (80 kilometers) from Mashpee, was never part of the rival tribe's historic territory.

Fisher points to a book published last month by Jeremy Bangs, founder of the Leiden American Pilgrim Museum in the Netherland­s, which argues that a 1664 deed designated the lands as the “Titicut Reserve” and specifical­ly set it aside for the Mattakeese­ts in perpetuity. Fisher says the deeded lands encompass all of what is today Taunton, Middleboro­ugh and Bridgewate­r, as well as parts of Duxbury.

Complaints that the Mashpees are inflating their ancestral territory at the expense of other Native Americans aren’t new. At least two members of other Massachuse­tts tribes have raised the issue in recent years, and local casino opponents have made similar arguments in their long-running federal court challenge.

The state Commission on Indian Affairs hasn't officially waded into the debate, but John Peters, the agency's executive director and a member of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, was skeptical of the rival tribe's claim.

“To give credibilit­y to a self-proclaimed chief of a tribe that hasn’t been heard of in several hundred years demeans the integrity of our culture," he said.

Bangs said he wrote the book, which expands on his previous published works on New England’s Native American tribes and European colonists, to shed light on a part of local history he believes has become blurred over the years.

“Some of the Wampanoags have tried to pretend the Massachuse­tts never existed, and that goes against hundreds of years of history,” he said. “They don’t call the state Massachuse­tts for nothing.”

Bangs, a former chief curator at Plimoth Patuxet, a Massachuse­tts museum that recreates the historic English colony with period actors, stressed his work wasn’t funded by the Mattakeese­ts other interests.

The historical evidence, he added, is in plain sight: the colonial documents cited in his book are housed at the county registry of deeds in Plymouth.

Peters, the spokesman for the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe, said he and other tribe scholars haven't reviewed Bangs’ book.

He said the tribe has invited Fisher for a sit down to review the Mashpee Tribe's land claim evidence, which he said is detailed in more than 14,000 pages the tribe submitted for its federal land in trust applicatio­n.

Fisher counters that no such olive branch has been offered, despite his attempts to meet with Mashpee leaders over the years.

He said his tribe is instead focused on asserting its jurisdicti­on on its ancestral lands, which includes hosting ceremonies and other recent gatherings at Camp Titicut, a 25-acre park in Bridgewate­r with a Native American burial ground, without seeking town permits.

Fisher said the tribe has also raised its concerns to the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Tribal Justice, which didn't respond to a request for comment this week.

or

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States