Texarkana Gazette

Vaccine mixed messages were a failure at all levels

-

Some confusion about COVID-19 vaccinatio­ns — how to get one, where to sign up, etc. — was inevitable, given the speed of the rollout and uncertaint­y about how many doses might be available from week to week. It’s the largest inoculatio­n campaign in U.S. history, and data about availabili­ty change by the day if not the hour.

But the chaos sowed at every level of government has made the confusion worse.

Once the first vaccines were available, the number of doses ready to be shipped to each state has been changing weekly, making it hard to plan for dispersal.

California state officials own some of the blame as well for creating an overly complicate­d system for determinin­g eligibilit­y and for not communicat­ing pandemic response details with locals. So do Los Angeles County officials who have sent mixed messages to Angelenos about who can get vaccinated and when.

To explain, we need to backtrack to last week, when federal officials urged states to expand eligibilit­y for inoculatio­ns to anyone over 65 as a way to ensure no doses go to waste. Each vial of the two vaccines currently available contains multiple doses that must be thrown away within six hours if not used.

States, including California, agreed to the expansion — though they did so on the mistaken belief that the federal government was about to ship more vaccine from the stockpile that had been held back for second doses. That turned out to be a final COVID-19 deception by the Trump administra­tion, because days later it became clear that there was no stockpile to release. However, the state left it up to counties in California to determine if they had the supply to expand access beyond the initial target group of healthcare workers and residents of long-term care facilities.

Los Angeles County Director of Public Health Barbara Ferrer made it clear at that point that the county was not yet in a position to expand beyond those first two groups. She predicted that it would be February before there would be enough supply to open up appointmen­ts for other people. It was not a well-received message among some, particular­ly when other counties were inviting all seniors to be inoculated.

Supervisor Sheila Kuehl echoed Ferrer’s message Saturday in her newsletter to constituen­ts, and Supervisor Janice Hahn suggested in her own Saturday newsletter that the county should at least have a standby list of people 65 and older to receive leftover vaccines at the end of each day. On Monday, supervisor and board Chairwoman Hilda Solis announced a surprise reversal of course, issuing an executive order that made vaccines available to people 65 and older starting Thursday through appointmen­ts on the county’s COVID-19 website. Yeah, that’s not confusing. During a Tuesday news briefing held by Solis (with no other members of the board speaking), Ferrer acknowledg­ed that the county has received just 685,000 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine so far from the state, though she expects 168,000 more this week, and most are needed for health care workers. How many of the county’s seniors might be able to get a shot is entirely contingent on how many doses the county receives in the future, which is a unknown quantity.

In other words, it will probably still be February at least before the vast majority of LA’s seniors can receive their first dose, as Ferrer said from the beginning. We don’t expect perfection in this historic vaccinatio­n effort. But we do expect that elected officials work to lessen the confusion, not exacerbate it.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States