Texarkana Gazette

Police under scrutiny after riot

Agencies in 12 states look into behavior of 31 officers in D.C.

- MARTHA BELLISLE AND JAKE BLEIBERG

Police department­s across the nation face a dilemma as they review the behavior of dozens of officers who were in Washington the day then-President Donald Trump’s supporters seized the Capitol.

For two Virginia police officers who posed for a photo during the deadly U.S. Capitol insurrecti­on, the reckoning has been swift and public: They were identified, charged with crimes and arrested.

Officials and experts agree that officers who were involved in the melee should be fired and charged for their role.

But for five Seattle officers the outcome is less clear. Their identities still secret, two are on leave and three continue to work while a police watchdog investigat­es whether their actions in the nation’s capital on Jan. 6 crossed the line from protected political speech to lawbreakin­g.

An Associated Press survey of law enforcemen­t agencies nationwide found that at least 31 officers in 12 states are being scrutinize­d by their supervisor­s for their behavior in the District of Columbia or face criminal charges for participat­ing in the riot.

Officials are looking into whether the officers violated any laws or policies or participat­ed in the violence while in Washington.

Most of the officers have not been publicly identified; only a few have been charged. Some were identified by online sleuths. Others were reported by their colleagues or turned themselves in.

They come from some of the country’s largest cities — three Los Angeles officers and a sheriff’s deputy, for instance — as well as state agencies and a Pennsylvan­ia police department with nine officers. Among them are an Oklahoma sheriff and New Hampshire police chief who have acknowledg­ed being at the rally, but denied entering the Capitol or breaking the law.

“The Arkansas State Police respects the rights and freedom of an employee to use their leave time as the employee may choose,” department spokesman Bill Sadler said of two officers who attended the Trump rally.

“If they were off-duty, it’s totally free speech,” said Will Aitchison, a lawyer in Portland, Ore., who represents law enforcemen­t officers. “People have the right to express their political views regardless of who’s standing next to them. You just don’t get guilt by associatio­n.”

But Ayesha Bell Hardaway, a professor at Case Western Reserve University law school, said an officer’s presence at the rally creates a credibilit­y issue as law enforcemen­t agencies work to repair community trust, especially after last summer’s protests against police brutality sparked by the police killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor.

In Rocky Mount, Va., a town of about 1,000, Sgt. Thomas Robertson and Officer Jacob Fracker face criminal charges after posting a photo of themselves inside the Capitol during the riot. According to court records, Robertson wrote on social media that the “Left are just mad because we actually attacked the government who is the problem … The right IN ONE DAY took the f ***** U.S. Capitol. Keep poking us.” Robertson said Rocky Mount is firing the officers, the Roanoke Times reported Sunday. The officers had been suspended without pay as of Friday.

Attempts to contact the officers were unsuccessf­ul and court records do not list lawyers. Leaders in Rocky Mount declined to be interviewe­d. In a statement, they said the events at the Capitol were tragic.

“We stand with and add our support to those who have denounced the violence and illegal activity that took place that day,” said Police Chief Ken Criner, Capt. Mark Lovern and Town Manager James Ervin. “Our town and our police department absolutely does not condone illegal or unethical behavior by anyone, including our officers and staff.”

On the other side of the country, five Seattle officers are under investigat­ion by the city’s Office of Police Accountabi­lity. Two officers posted photos of themselves on social media while in the district and officials are investigat­ing to determine where they were and what they were doing. Three others told supervisor­s that they went to Washington for the events and are being investigat­ed for what they did while there.

Seattle Police Chief Adrian Diaz said his department supports officers’ freedom of speech and that those who were in the nation’s capital will be fired if they “were directly involved in the insurrecti­on at the U.S. Capitol.”

But police leaders need to evaluate more than just clear criminal behavior, according to Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, a policing research and policy group. They must also consider how their actions affect a department’s credibilit­y, he said.

Officers’ First Amendment rights “don’t extend to expressing words that may be violent or maybe express some prejudice,” Wexler said, “because that’s going to reflect on what they do when they’re working, when they’re testifying in court.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States