Texarkana Gazette

Wall Street counsels Washington against kicking Russia off SWIFT

- By Daniel Flatley, Katherine Doherty and Hannah Levitt

Some of Wall Street’s largest banks told lawmakers and the Biden administra­tion that kicking Russia off the SWIFT financial-messaging system would have far-reaching fallout that could hurt the global economy and undermine the purpose of the penalties, people familiar with the matter said.

Firms including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc. suggested Washington stick with other types of sanctions to punish Russia for invading Ukraine, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing private talks. Other banks with less internatio­nal exposure were more receptive to the idea, telling officials that it would be a manageable step. Representa­tives from the banks declined to comment.

Opponents of the idea passed along a warning:

Booting Russia from the critical global system — which handles 42 million messages a day and serves as a lifeline to some of the world’s biggest financial institutio­ns — could backfire, sending inflation higher, pushing Russia closer to China and shielding financial transactio­ns from scrutiny by the West. It might also encourage the developmen­t of a SWIFT alternativ­e that could eventually damage the supremacy of the U.S. dollar.

While refusing to rule out even the most drastic financial penalties, Biden administra­tion officials privately concede that they aren’t seriously considerin­g the SWIFT option for now because doing so would choke off all trade with Russia, including energy sales that are allowed under current sanctions. Such a move could also have much wider ramificati­ons, possibly causing an energy crisis in Europe and ruining the livelihood­s of ordinary Russians, a scenario officials say they want to avoid.

Members of Congress started calling for the U.S. to take the almost unpreceden­ted step of unplugging Russia from the system — something the Biden administra­tion has said the U.S. cannot do unilateral­ly — after previous measures failed to deter Russian President Vladimir Putin from carrying out the invasion. SWIFT has only blocked one nation in its history: Iran in 2012 as part of measures aimed at containing the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program.

The debate has split Democrats and Republican­s on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who have offered competing measures to sanction Russia for its aggression. The Democratic bill, introduced by Chairman Bob Menendez, authorizes the president to impose sanctions on financial-messaging systems including SWIFT. The Republican bill, introduced by Sen. Jim Risch, includes secondary sanctions on banks but doesn’t touch

SWIFT.

In a call with reporters Thursday, Risch said the U.S. doesn’t have the authority to remove Russia from SWIFT on its own. Imposing secondary sanctions on Russian banks — effectivel­y penalizing any other institutio­n that does business with them — would achieve the intended effect and “shut down the Russian economy,” the Idaho Republican said.

“SWIFT does not belong to the United States,” Risch said. However, “if you impose secondary sanctions, SWIFT is going to have to recognize those.”

PRESSING BIDEN

Menendez, along with Sens. Bob Casey, Chris Van Hollen and House Intelligen­ce Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, has pressed the administra­tion to remove Russia from SWIFT, something Biden has said cannot be done without the help of European allies.

“Congress and the Biden administra­tion must not shy away from any options — including sanctionin­g the Russian Central Bank, removing Russian banks from the SWIFT payment system, crippling Russia’s key industries, sanctionin­g Putin personally, and taking all steps to deprive Putin and his inner circle of their assets,” Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat, said in a statement.

SWIFT representa­tives sought a meeting with Menendez in recent weeks as he put together his sanctions package, but he turned them down, according to a person familiar with the matter. Republican­s on the relevant committees have had conversati­ons with the financial industry and SWIFT to ensure that secondary sanctions would cut off Russian banks and therefore the Russian economy, according to a second person.

A representa­tive for SWIFT couldn’t immediatel­y confirm the outreach, citing the late hour in Belgium, where the service is headquarte­red.

Daniel Fried, who was ambassador to Poland during the Clinton administra­tion, praised Biden’s moves Thursday and said in a tweet that kicking Russia out of SWIFT was “overrated” as a deterrent. However, he said in an email exchange Friday that while the move would be largely symbolic, “at this point, symbols count,” and that he would favor removing the country from the service.

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said Friday that the Netherland­s supports barring Russia from SWIFT. The EU “took a big step forward concerning SWIFT,” Rutte said at a press briefing in The Hague. “We drew a clear picture based on a proposal from the French on what the pros and cons are to make sure we can decide to add it at a later stage.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States