Forgetting to disclose repairs still considered to be fraud

Question: We owned a home in Phoenix for 12 years. When we listed our home for sale, my wife with the help of our real estate agent completed the seller’s property disclosure statement. I just signed the SPDS one night when I came home from work. Although we had done several repairs to the roof, my wife forgot about these roof repairs when she filled out the SDPS.

We sold the home three months ago. We received a letter from the buyer’s attorney this week saying that the buyer has had major problems with the roof. The buyer’s attorney also said that, after we moved out, the buyers found some old roof repair bills in the garage. The buyer’s attorney claims that we committed fraud by not disclosing these roof repairs, and that we now have to pay the buyers $12,000 for the cost of a new roof.

Under the standard purchase contract for our home, the buyers were told that they should have a roof inspection. Why are we responsible to pay for the buyer’s new roof when my wife just forgot that the roof had been repaired a few times, and the purchase contract told the buyer to get a roof inspection?

Answer: You are correct that the standard purchase contract says that the buyer should have a roof inspection. If you and your wife failed to disclose the roof repairs in the SPDS, however, a judge would likely rule that you and your wife committed fraud.

In the parlance of a card game like bridge, fraud “trumps” negligence. In other words, even though the buyer may have been negligent in not having a roof inspection, your fraudulent nondisclosure of the roof repairs should make you liable to pay for the buyer’s new roof.