The Arizona Republic

Trump: Hire more agents

President calls for 15,000 new ICE, CBP workers

- DANIEL GONZÁLEZ

President Donald Trump has called for the hiring of 15,000 new immigratio­n and border agents to help carry out his executive orders to greatly increase immigratio­n enforcemen­t inside the United States and along its southern border.

In memos implementi­ng the president’s executive orders on immigratio­n and border security, Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly said Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t should “expeditiou­sly hire” 10,000 additional agents and U.S. Customs and Border Protection should “immediatel­y begin” hiring 5,000 additional Border Patrol agents.

Combined, the 15,000 new agents would cost $1.38 billion to $1.48 billion annually, or between $13 billion to nearly $15 billion over 10 years, according to estimates by the Migration Policy Institute.

Such a massive buildup in staffing would require approval from Congress, could take years to achieve, and could lead to changes in hiring standards aimed at preventing corruption and bribery from drug cartels.

Trump’s plan would likely encounter strong resistance from Democrats and from fiscal conservati­ves in his own party in Congress. It comes as the

president wants to build a giant southweste­rn border wall to curtail illegal immigratio­n and is also calling for a sharp increase in military spending that would be paid for by slashing other areas of the federal budget, including education, the environmen­t and foreign aid.

“This is very expensive. It’s clear that President Trump has a desire to shift resources towards Homeland Security, but shift them from where, because this is a lot of money,” said Ryan Alexander, director of Taxpayers for Common Sense, an independen­t watchdog group.

“What is the evidence that this is going to make the difference that you want to make? (That is what) is missing right now.”

Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigratio­n Reform, a group that supports Trump’s immigratio­n-enforcemen­t plans, said Congress ultimately will have to decide how many more ICE and Border Patrol agents to fund.

But he said 10,000 more ICE agents are needed to expand the agency’s ability to arrest and deport immigrants who violate immigratio­n laws. The additional costs would be worth it, he said.

“It costs a lot of money to not enforce immigratio­n laws,” he said. “The failure to enforce our immigratio­n laws leads to billions of social costs to the American public every year. There has to be a sense that if the law says that if you are in the country illegally then you are subject to deportatio­n, and that that means something.”

Mehlman said he also supports hiring 5,000 additional Border Patrol agents, which he says are needed to deter the recent increase in apprehensi­ons and gain control of the entire border.

Mehlman said, “Deterrence is an important part of any type of law enforcemen­t. When people believe there are law-enforcemen­t officers out there prepared to enforce the law, they behave rationally, they decide not to break it in the first place.”

When it comes to immigratio­n enforcemen­t, Border Patrol agents are primarily responsibl­e for stopping people from entering the country illegally between official ports of entry along the southern and northern borders. ICE agents and officers, meanwhile, are responsibl­e for finding, arresting and deporting immigrants caught living inside the U.S. without authorizat­ion or who commit crimes that revoke their privileges to remain in the U.S. legally.

The Migration Policy Institute estimates hiring 10,000 new ICE officers would cost $600 million to $700 million annually or between $6 billion and $7 billion over 10 years.

ICE requested total funding of $6.2 billion for fiscal 2017 and the agency employs 19,971 people, including 5,900 Enforcemen­t and Removal Operations officers and 6,000 special agents assigned to its Homeland Security Investigat­ions division.

Hiring 5,000 new Border Patrol agents, meanwhile, would cost an additional $780 million annually, according to the institute. That works out to $7.8 billion over 10 years.

Customs and Border Protection requested $13.9 billion for fiscal 2017. That includes funding for 21,070 Border Patrol agents, or about a third of the agency’s entire 61,484 employees.

“To hire around 15,000 additional personnel, the administra­tion will need congressio­nal appropriat­ions,” said Faye Hipsman, a policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute. “There does not currently exist money within these agencies to staff up so significan­tly.”

Even if Congress approves the funding, “the hiring process would be lengthy,” Hipsman said.

CBP has already struggled to fill available positions. It had 19,828 Border Patrol agents in fiscal 2016, according to the most recent data available. That was 1,542 fewer than the 21,370 available Border Patrol positions that year.

“It’s a tough job, it requires long hours, and it requires people to live in areas that are more remote and might not be as desirable, so there are a lot of reasons why the agency has had difficulty keeping up with hiring levels,” Hipsman said.

U.S. Rep. Raúl Grijalva, D-Ariz., cast doubt on Trump’s plan to hire 15,000 new ICE and CBP officers, given the costs, the needed approval from Congress and existing hiring difficulti­es.

“I think it’s a number that is unrealisti­c,” he said.

He also said it would be a mistake to loosen hiring standards given that ICE and Border Patrol agents are given far more latitude to deport immigrants under Trump’s immigratio­n orders.

Department of Homeland Security officials have testified to lawmakers in Congress that criminal organizati­ons have tried to infiltrate the CBP during previous hiring surges, the report said.

“I think that is very dangerous,” Grijalva said. “The rush to judgement in hiring all those people initially when huge increases in Border Patrol personnel occurred produced a lot of problems, with a lot of people that shouldn’t be in there. It produced problems with the integrity of the force itself.”

Republic reporter Dan Nowicki contribute­d to this article.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States