The Arizona Republic

The health high wire

-

Republican­s are walking a high wire as they move toward the long-sought goal of repealing “Obamacare.” Moving too fast could mean trouble. On one side are conservati­ves who denounce the House plan as Obamacare-lite. They bristle at anything short of the full repeal that’s been the goal for years.

On the other side are Americans who stand to lose coverage. Some are older, lower-income people who fueled the Trump revolution. If they start telling their stories on social media, the GOP may pay a price in the 2018 midterm elections. Let’s be clear: Reform is essential. Yet the task of replacing Obamacare got more complicate­d with the release of the nonpartisa­n Congressio­nal Budget Office analysis, which says 14 million people will lose health coverage by 2018 under the House repeal-and-replace plan. By 2026, the number rises to 24 million.

The Trump administra­tion has tried to dismiss the CBO report, but, as Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy said: “You have to have an umpire.” Otherwise, you are simply listening to yes men. It’s worth considerin­g the consequenc­es.

Another example of unintended consequenc­es: Arizona could lose $46.8 million in federal dollars for publicheal­th programs that cover such things as childhood immunizati­ons, diabetes management and threats to public health, according to reporting by The Republic’s Ken Alltucker.

Federal funding to states for public health predates Obamacare, but the House repeal-and-replace bill eliminates it.

Promises from the White House and others to make improvemen­ts to this bill are encouragin­g. But it will be hard to fix everything at the speed this is moving.

Republican­s who want to emerge with good public policy and a political advantage should take a long view. They need to remember how they criticized Obamacare for being pushed through with too little attention to detail.

Doing it right is better than doing it fast. Obamacare created expectatio­ns. As Arizona Sen. John McCain puts it: “We cannot abandon any group of Americans who have become accustomed to receiving health care.” President Donald Trump has also pledged that no one would lose coverage, though his White House has equivocate­d on that since.

The House plan bowed to the reality that it is tough to eliminate the more popular parts of the Affordable Care Act, such as the provisions on pre-existing conditions and coverage for offspring to age 26. Keeping these mandates is politicall­y smart but will make it harder to create the market-driven system conservati­ves want.

What’s more, the refundable tax credits in the House proposal are seen by some conservati­ves as uncomforta­bly similar to the taxpayer subsidies available under Obamacare.

Another part of the reform deals with the Medicaid expansion that many states — including Arizona — used to extend coverage to low-income people. The federal government currently picks up most of the cost.

The House GOP plan phases out the expansion after 2020, which means Arizona would have to pay steadily rising costs or people would lose coverage.

During the recession, when enrollment was frozen in this state’s Medicaid program, the Arizona Health Care Cost Containmen­t System, 250,000 people lost coverage, leading to a surge in people seeking emergency-room care, according to reporting by Alltucker.

Arizona hospitals faced big costs to provide uncompensa­ted care to these vulnerable individual­s who lacked any other option. This is why hospitals supported — and were willing to help pay for — Medicaid expansion in our state.

Republican­s in Congress need to carefully consider the consequenc­es of destabiliz­ing the health-care industry nationwide.

The House plan restructur­es Medicaid as block grants to states, which could result in caps on the number of people covered. This change could also allow states more flexibilit­y and result in cost savings. These are significan­t changes in a safety-net program.

The consequenc­es need to be fully understood and supported by the public.

Republican­s have long wanted to repeal Obamacare. Now they have the opportunit­y. But racing along the high wire could have significan­t adverse consequenc­es.

It is better to go slowly and do this right.

 ?? MARK WILSON/GETTY IMAGES ?? Repealing and replacing “Obamacare” is fraught with political peril. The GOP should move slowly unless it wants to pay a price next election.
MARK WILSON/GETTY IMAGES Repealing and replacing “Obamacare” is fraught with political peril. The GOP should move slowly unless it wants to pay a price next election.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States