The Arizona Republic

A H2OPE FOR COOPERATIO­N

Everyone loses if we cannot agree on how we use water

- MARK TAYLOR AND ALEXANDRA ARBOLEDA

Arizona water interests have reached an impasse on an agreement being negotiated to respond to drought on the Colorado River. In addition, our water management agencies are now in a legal dispute.

As new members of the Central Arizona Water Conservati­on District Board of Directors representi­ng Maricopa and Pima counties, we believe that cooperatio­n is imperative to protect our water during this time of water scarcity. Water is critical to our future, our economy and our way of life.

Arizonans have a history of putting partisansh­ip aside and finding common ground when it comes to resolving our water disputes. With vision and leadership, we have created a thriving economy and secured our water future. It has not been easy, requiring negotiatio­n, cooperatio­n and compromise.

The water scarcity dilemma on the Colorado River is two-fold: We’re facing an extended drought and a “structural deficit,” which means that the Colorado River is over-allocated by about 1.2 million acre feet (or a 12 foot reduction in Lake Mead’s water elevation per year).

To manage water scarcity during an almost twodecade-long drought, Arizona water leaders agreed to the 2007 Shortage and Sharing Guidelines. They are currently negotiatin­g three drought plans: 1) the Drought Contingenc­y Plan with California and Nevada, 2) the Drought Contingenc­y Plan Plus among Arizona water interests, and 3) Minute 32x with Mexico.

The purpose of the Drought Contingenc­y Plan is to address the immediate problem of drought by re-

ducing the use of Colorado River water to prevent lower water levels in Lake Mead from triggering water shortages. The urgency of the dilemma is felt most profoundly by Arizona because we have the lowest priority to Colorado River water, meaning that our Central Arizona Project supplies will be reduced first and in larger quantities than California and Nevada, with potentiall­y significan­t impacts on our economy.

Because the risks of shortage at Lake Mead are so high to Arizonans, we negotiated the Drought Contingenc­y Plan Plus to save even more water in Lake Mead by reducing Colorado River water use and storage within Arizona for three years.

Some water users would receive monetary compensati­on or credits to temporaril­y leave their water in the lake rather than using it or storing it in aquifers within Arizona. Some of the funding would come from tax dollars.

In wet years, the contributi­ons of water to Lake Mead contemplat­ed by the Drought Contingenc­y Plan Plus could have the unintended consequenc­e of reducing the amount of water that gets released from Lake Powell under the 2007 Guidelines, which could then trigger a shortage at Lake Mead.

Central Arizona Project experts want to avoid unintentio­nally triggering a shortage at taxpayer expense and believe that a flexible approach to managing water savings in Lake Mead, which takes into account the highly variable hydrology of the river as well as water savings efforts of other states, would allow water managers to more effectivel­y avoid future shortages at the lake.

Ultimately, lasting conservati­on measures are critical to the long-term health of the Colorado River and solving the structural deficit.

Arizonans must work together to increase the efficiency of our water use, to be cognizant of how we grow, and to cut back on our water consumptio­n. It is essential that we put our difference­s aside to find innovative solutions that result in lasting conservati­on to improve the health of the river and to secure our water supplies.

In the short term, we need the flexibilit­y to determine the best way to save our water each year with the goal of reducing the probabilit­y of triggering shortage at Lake Mead. In the long-term, we must work together toward the goal of lasting conservati­on on the Colorado River and reducing the structural deficit.

The Arizona Legislatur­e created the Water Conservati­on District, which is overseen by an elected non-partisan board accountabl­e to the people of Maricopa, Pinal and Pima counties, to levy taxes, pay for constructi­on of the Central Arizona Project canal, operate and maintain the canal, and deliver safe, reliable water to its customers. The Water Conservati­on District is also responsibl­e for managing replenishm­ent and water storage programs.

The Water Conservati­on District works closely with the Arizona Department of Water Resources, which has general control and supervisio­n of surface water, including Central Arizona Project water, and groundwate­r in the state.

This collaborat­ive partnershi­p is an essential element in Arizona’s effective water management, ensuring that the knowledge and expertise of both the Water Conservati­on District and the Department of Water Resources are harnessed when making decisions that impact the Colorado River and Central Arizona Project.

It is essential that Arizonans continue working together to avoid shortages on Lake Mead in times of drought and to achieve lasting conservati­on of Colorado River water. This means there must be room to express different viewpoints, creative alternativ­es and innovative approaches to water management. Negotiatio­n, cooperatio­n and compromise, while difficult, result in the best solutions.

One thing is certain, however. If we can’t reach agreement, everyone is worse off. We live in this desert together, and water sustains us all.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ?? MARK HENLE/THE REPUBLIC ?? The Central Arizona Project canal cuts through the desert west of Phoenix.
MARK HENLE/THE REPUBLIC The Central Arizona Project canal cuts through the desert west of Phoenix.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States