The Arizona Republic

Tax lien exploitati­on is a dark corner of foreclosur­e world

- EMILY L. MAHONEY AND CHARLES T. CLARK

It was the home where Devoe Poleeson, the proud family cook and grill master, taught his daughter how to fry eggs. It was the home where he set the oven timer to awaken the kids for school before he left for work. And it was the family gathering place — for holiday parties, wedding receptions and even wakes — during the four decades he lived in the modest west Phoenix home. The mortgage had long since been paid off. But in 2010, a decade after Poleeson’s death, an investor from Utah legally seized the home because a mere $808 in property taxes had gone unpaid.

“It was tragic for us, for our family, because ... we grew up in that house and all of our memories are there,” said Patricia Miller, Poleeson’s daughter. “It was a loss that we just couldn’t really do anything about. There just wasn’t enough money from the insurance he had left to cover everything.”

The avalanche of foreclosur­es that devastated Arizona’s real estate market after the 2008 crash arose when thousands of homeowners were unable to pay their mortgages. But since then, other homeowners have faced their own foreclosur­e crisis, quietly losing their homes at a rate that didn’t peak until 2015.

Tens of thousands of people were at risk of foreclosur­e in recent years after they fell behind on their property taxes. And, like Miller, hundreds of those people lost their homes, and all their equity — not to the bank or local government, but to private investors.

Homeowners who fall behind on tax bills by as little as Poleeson’s $808 — sometimes by $50 or less — can have their debt bought by other investors or banks. With what’s known as a “tax lien” on the property, those investors then have the right to collect not just the debt, but compoundin­g interest, too.

If homeowners can’t pay the tax plus interest, they lose their homes and all the equity they’ve gained.

A review of more than six years of data on tax-lien foreclosur­es across Arizona shows most of the hundreds of thousands of propertyta­x liens in the state were paid off, sidesteppi­ng foreclosur­e. And a closer look at Maricopa County shows many tax-lien seizures involved vacant lots.

But of the cases that do lead to foreclosur­e — 1,734 in Maricopa County since 2010 — more than a third are primary residences. That means that 642 homeowners lost their homes and all their equity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States