The Arizona Republic

Senate will investigat­e:

- ALIA BEARD RAU AND YVONNE WINGETT SANCHEZ

The Senate Ethics Committee voted Thursday to investigat­e allegation­s that state Sen. Catherine Miranda mishandled petition signatures in the battle over the expansion of the school-voucher program. Such complaints are rare and usually are reserved for the most serious offenses.

“If you look at actual evidence that’s in the complaint, there’s just not much there at all.”

The Senate Ethics Committee voted Thursday to investigat­e allegation­s that state Sen. Catherine Miranda mishandled petition signatures in the battle over the expansion of the state’s school-voucher program.

Such complaints are rare, and usually are reserved for the most serious offenses. They can result in expulsion from the Legislatur­e.

Miranda, D-Phoenix, voted against expanding the Empowermen­t Scholarshi­p Account program during the legislativ­e session and, after its passage, collected signatures for the effort to refer the expansion to the ballot.

Amy Andrea Celaya, a Gilbert parent who supported ESA expansion, wrote the complaint on letterhead from the group Parents United. She alleges Miranda collected signatures using a petition document that did not check a box designatin­g her as a volunteer signature-gatherer and that someone checked the box after the fact.

The complaint was sent to the Arizona Senate by Chris Perea, a teacher at Gateway Academy and supporter of the school-voucher expansion law who has worked with influentia­l groups pushing for expansion, including Americans for Prosperity and the American Federation for Children.

The complaint included a Twitter photo showing Miranda with the paper with the unchecked box. It was checked when the paper was turned in to the Secretary of State’s Office.

The complaint alleges Miranda’s actions violate state law and so merit an ethics investigat­ion. Knowingly falsifying a petition sheet is a misdemeano­r offense.

The Senate Ethics Committee consists of three Republican­s and two

Democrats. The Republican­s voted to investigat­e the complaint.

The Republican­s decided to first refer the complaint to the Attorney General’s Office for investigat­ion and delay their own investigat­ion until that probe is finished.

Sen. Steve Montenegro, R-Litchfield Park, a member of the ethics committee, said the motion doesn’t indicate guilt, but starts an investigat­ive process.

“These are clearly just proceeding­s, questions being asked,” he said. “In no way does this reflect the body’s prejudice on any decision at all.”

Sen. Martin Quezada, D-Phoenix, who is on the committee, noted how unusual it is for someone outside the Legislatur­e to file such a complaint. He said he doesn’t think the allegation rises to the level of an ethics complaint.

“If you look at actual evidence that’s in the complaint, there’s just not much there at all,” he said. “This is a witch hunt. This is political retributio­n against anybody who worked to oppose a law shoved through this Legislatur­e.”

Attorney Tom Ryan, who is representi­ng Miranda pro-bono, also questioned why the complaint was being entertaine­d, saying the allegation includes no evidence of intent.

“This is payback. The ultimate result could be expulsion,” he said. “This is using a thermonucl­ear bomb to wipe out a gnat. That’s how silly and frivolous this is.”

Miranda did not attend the hearing.

A similar ethics complaint was filed against Rep. Isela Blanc, D-Tempe, in the Arizona House. The House Ethics Committee has not yet taken action on that complaint.

The Secretary of State’s Office had already referred the matter to the Attorney General’s Office.

Lawmakers haven’t expelled a lawmaker in more than 20 years, although a handful have resigned in the midst of such investigat­ions. The last ethics committee investigat­ions were in 2012.

The Senate committee investigat­ed domestic-violence allegation­s against former Republican Sen. Scott Bundgaard. The House investigat­ed former Democratic Rep. Daniel Patterson for allegation­s of domestic violence, as well as numerous allegation­s of aggressive and dishonest behavior toward other House members.

In both cases, the men were already facing criminal charges related to the domestic-violence allegation­s. Both resigned before the ethics process concluded.

The Miranda complaint stems from the battle to keep in place Senate Bill 1431, which the Legislatur­e passed earlier this session and Gov. Doug Ducey signed.

That measure made all 1.1 million Arizona students eligible to apply for the state’s school-voucher program, which grants tax dollars to parents for private-school tuition or other education expenses. While broadening eligibilit­y, the bill capped the number of recipients at 30,000 by 2022.

Prior to expansion — which Gov. Doug Ducey and Republican lawmakers narrowly muscled through the Legislatur­e in April — the program had been limited to certain students, including those with special needs, in poor-performing schools or from military families.

Save Our Schools Arizona collected more than 100,000 signatures to refer the measure to the November 2018 ballot.

The American Federation for Children and Americans for Prosperity are fighting in court to keep the voucher-expansion measure in place.

 ?? SENATE ETHICS COMMITTEE MEMBER ?? SEN. MARTIN QUEZADA The Senate Ethics Committee voted Thursday to investigat­e state Sen. Catherine Miranda.
SENATE ETHICS COMMITTEE MEMBER SEN. MARTIN QUEZADA The Senate Ethics Committee voted Thursday to investigat­e state Sen. Catherine Miranda.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States