The Arizona Republic

Counsel queries Bannon

- Mary Clare Jalonick and Jonathan Lemire ASSOCIATED PRESS

Former Trump strategist Steve Bannon was questioned two days this week in Robert Mueller’s Russia investigat­ion, the Associated Press reports.

WASHINGTON – Steve Bannon, the combative former chief strategist for President Donald Trump, was interrogat­ed for 20 hours over two days this week as part of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigat­ion, according to a person familiar with the process.

The person, who declined to be named because they were not authorized to publicly discuss the investigat­ion, said Bannon answered every question that was put to him by Mueller’s team. That’s in contrast to a Thursday interview with the House intelligen­ce committee, where Bannon declined to answer some of lawmakers’ questions, despite a subpoena.

While the exact questions for Bannon are unknown, Mueller is investigat­ing whether there was any coordinati­on between Trump’s campaign and Russians who meddled in the 2016 election, and also whether there have been any efforts to obstruct the ongoing FBI probe into those contacts.

The House panel is investigat­ing the meddling and whether Trump’s campaign was involved.

Because Bannon was one of Trump’s top advisers, both Mueller and the lawmakers were expected to question him about key events during his time in the White House, including Trump’s firings of former national security adviser Michael Flynn and former FBI Director James Comey.

After Bannon’s roughly three-hour interview on Capitol Hill, Republican­s on the House intelligen­ce panel were weighing whether to hold him in contempt. Like his first visit to the House intelligen­ce committee in January, Bannon declined to answer questions in the closed-door session.

According to lawmakers of both parties, Bannon would only answer 25 questions that had been pre-approved by the White House when asked about any events in the time period after President Donald Trump’s election. His answer to each question was “no” and he told the committee he was not authorized to elaborate.

Bannon was already under subpoena as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have been critical of the White House’s sweeping interpreta­tion of executive privilege and its contention that pretty much everything is off limits until the president says it’s not.

The escalating fight between Congress and the White House over the privilege issue has centered around Bannon, an outsized figure in President Donald Trump’s campaign and White House and an inspiratio­n to some conservati­ves as he has publicly battled the Republican establishm­ent. He was fired from the White House last summer, and more recently had a falling out with Trump after the January publicatio­n of a book in which he sharply criticized Trump family members.

Despite his fractured relationsh­ip with Trump, Bannon has followed White House direction as the House lawmakers have sought to talk to him. At issue is whether Bannon can talk about the presidenti­al transition, his time at the White House and communicat­ions with Trump and others since he left last summer.

Texas Rep. Mike Conaway, the Republican leading the panel’s Russia probe, said Bannon would only answer the pre-approved questions about any time period past the day Trump was elected in November 2016. He said committee Republican­s would discuss whether to hold Bannon in contempt with House lawyers and with House Speaker Paul Ryan, who is likely to have the final say.

“That’s an ongoing conversati­on we’ll have among an awful lot of lawyers,” Conaway said after Bannon’s interview.

At least one Republican on the intelligen­ce panel said before the interview that a contempt vote would be necessary if Bannon were uncooperat­ive. Florida Rep. Tom Rooney said Tuesday that if Bannon didn’t cooperate with the panel and they didn’t hold him in contempt, that would set a bad precedent.

“For not just our committee but every committee, that (subpoenas) don’t mean anything, that it’s just a hollow threat,” Rooney said. “You can’t do that.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States