The Arizona Republic

Vehicle fee hike may help fix roads

Registrati­on cost would fund highway patrols

- Dustin Gardiner Arizona Republic USA TODAY NETWORK

Arizona motorists could soon face a new $17 to $20 vehicle-registrati­on fee as state lawmakers search for money to repair crumbling roads and bridges.

A coalition of Republican­s and Democrats are pushing legislatio­n that would create a new highway safety fee for motorists.

Ostensibly, the fee would pay for highway patrol operations. But, in a roundabout way, the fee is really about paying for road constructi­on and repairs.

Rep. Noel Campbell, R-Prescott, introduced the bill that would create a new vehicle registrati­on fee dedicated to funding highway patrol at the state Department of Public Safety.

“Nobody enjoys raising taxes, of course not,” he said during a hearing on the plan. “But you know the condition of the roads and bridges and infrastruc­ture in this state.”

The fee, estimated at about $18 for all

types of vehicles, would bring in about $149 million per year to pay for highway patrol costs, according to the Legislatur­e’s budget analysts.

For more than a decade, state leaders have taken funds intended for road repairs and instead used them to pay for highway patrol. The maneuver helped the state balance its budget during and after the Great Recession.

But the funding sweeps have come with consequenc­es.

Cities, towns and counties have scaled back road constructi­on and maintenanc­e. According to the League of Arizona Cities and Towns, more than $1.1 billion has been swept from road projects since 2001.

Now, Campbell and other lawmakers say that must stop as roads throughout the state are cracking and falling apart.

Is the increase necessary?

Some conservati­ve lawmakers are trying to stop the proposal, House Bill 2166, because they worry it gives bureaucrat­s too much power to impose a new fee on drivers.

The state House of Representa­tives voted 35-24 to pass the measure Feb. 20. But the proposal now faces its own rocky road in the state Senate, where a similar bill died last year.

“This could be construed as a $120 million tax to the people of Arizona,” said Rep. Paul Mosley, R-Lake Havasu City, an opponent of the fee. “I do have a problem giving a bureaucrat the power to raise our taxes without going through us.”

It’s also unclear if Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican who adamantly opposes tax hikes, would sign it. His spokesman said he generally doesn’t comment on legislatio­n that isn’t on his desk.

HB 2166 would earmark money from the fee for highway patrol operations. That gives the state a way to pay for it without raiding the road constructi­on and maintenanc­e piggy bank known as the Arizona Highway User Revenue Fund, or “HURF.”

Currently, the state is using about $84 million from the highway fund to pay for DPS patrol operations, according to legislativ­e budget analysts.

Money in the fund comes from gas taxes, which the state hasn’t increased since 1991, and vehicle-license fees.

Under the bill, one person — the director of the Arizona Department of Transporta­tion —would have authority to set the fee amount every year, in an amount necessary to fully fund highway-patrol operations.

Drivers would pay the safety fee when they renew their vehicle-registrati­on tags.

The bill also would eliminate the state’s license tax break for new alternativ­e-fuel vehicles over 10,000 pounds, starting in 2020.

That would affect heavy trucks that run on natural gas.

A tax break for smaller alternativ­efuel vehicles would be reduced starting the same year.

Campbell said scaling back tax breaks for alternativ­e-fuel trucks would also bring in more money to help fund road projects.

Arizona roads in ‘terrible’ shape

Advocates for cities and counties say funding cuts have left roads throughout the state in rough shape, particular­ly in rural communitie­s that have smaller tax bases than cities in the Phoenix metro area.

Some local government­s have enacted tax increases to pay for road projects on their own as a result. Others say they’ve put off maintenanc­e work for many years.

Graham County Supervisor Jim Palmer said the loss of funds has caused his county to consider converting some aging roads back to dirt. He worries that bad roads could hamper the state’s economic growth.

“We’re not addressing the problem,” Palmer said. “As the years go by, we’re going to start to see the roads get worse and worse.”

He said the problem isn’t just swept funds: Cars get far better gas mileage today than in the past, so gas-tax revenues haven’t kept pace with the wear-and-tear vehicles inflict on roads.

Ken Strobeck, executive director of the league of cities and towns, said while Gov. Doug Ducey has restored about $30 million of the swept funds in the current fiscal year and proposes to do the same next year, it hasn’t been enough.

He said HB 2166 will permanentl­y fund DPS, so the Legislatur­e can use road and highway repair funds for their intended purpose after decades of raiding it. “You get outside of the Valley, roads are just deteriorat­ing,” Strobeck said.

 ?? MOHAVE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ?? Nearly half of Mohave County’s roads are due for replacemen­t, plagued in places by cracking and erosion that has eaten chunks from the edges.
MOHAVE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Nearly half of Mohave County’s roads are due for replacemen­t, plagued in places by cracking and erosion that has eaten chunks from the edges.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States