The Arizona Republic

Yet another dirty plan to gut Clean Elections

- EJ Montini

They’re going after the Citizens Clean Elections Commission ... again. They don’t want clean.

They want dirty.

Twenty years ago, when the level of political corruption got to be too much even for those of us who live in Arizona, voters passed a citizens initiative called the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Act, which was meant to “restore citizen participat­ion and confidence in our political system.”

The new law created the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, under which candidates for legislativ­e and statewide offices who gather a minimum number of $5 contributi­ons would then renounce further private contributi­ons and, in return, receive campaign money from the state. The funding would come from surcharges on civil and criminal fines, tax donations and from increased fees from lobbyists.

Back then, Kaia Lenhart, political director of Arizonans for Clean Elections, said, “Public officials should not be bought by the highest bidder. Arizonans want and deserve elections, not auctions.”

That is still what Arizonans want and deserve.

But it is not what the Republican­s who control the Legislatur­e want. They’ve never wanted it.

And so this year, like almost each year for the past 20, they’re trying to gut Clean Elections.

This time, it’s House Concurrent Resolution 2007, which the supporters called the “No Taxpayer Money for Political Parties” act.

If it gets on the ballot and voters pass it the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, essentiall­y, would no longer exist.

Not in the form approved by voters, anyway, as an independen­t, nonpartisa­n entity.

As Joel Edman, executive director of Arizona Advocacy Network, wrote in the Arizona Capitol Times, “HCR 2007 eliminates the Clean Elections Commission’s independen­t, nonpartisa­n authority to administer and enforce the law, and instead gives final say over Clean Elections rules to the Governor’s Regulatory Review Council (GRRC), a hyper-partisan body stacked with corporate elites and profession­al political operatives...”

Under the system approved by voters, the commission is nonpartisa­n and independen­t.

The politician­s who control state government don’t like nonpartisa­n and independen­t.

You’ve seen them recently try to dismantle the Independen­t Redistrict­ing Commission. You’ve seen them recently attack the Voter Protection Act, which prevents politician­s from changing voter-approved laws.

They want citizens to elect them

and then they want you to just ... shut ... up. And do nothing, except what they say.

You want Clean Elections. They want them dirty. They’ll use every dirty trick they have.

Twenty years ago, the political director of the Clean Elections campaign said, “Big money that has a vested interest in maintainin­g the status quo is going to come out and oppose this. Right now, they run the current system and they feel pretty threatened by the prospect of losing that control.” They still run the system. They still feel threatened. Twenty years ago, when the level of political corruption got to be too much even for those of us who live in Arizona, voters passed a citizens initiative called the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Act, which was meant to “restore citizen participat­ion and confidence in our political system.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States