The Arizona Republic

Trump signs bill aimed at sex ads

- Richard Ruelas

President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed into law a bill that was originally aimed at shutting down the sex ads on Backpage.com, the classified advertisin­g website seized last week by federal authoritie­s as part of prostituti­on charges against its Arizona-based founders.

The bill, called the Stop Enabling Sex Trafficker­s Act, received praise from anti-sex traffickin­g advocates. It also has brought warnings from freespeech advocates who say it will have unintended consequenc­es for seemingly innocent websites.

The sponsors of the bill, which passed the House in February, made no secret that its target was Backpage, the classified advertisin­g website started in Phoenix by the former executives of the weekly tabloid newspaper New Times.

In a statement Wednesday, Arizona Sen. John McCain said the legislatio­n “delivers long-overdue changes to the law that for too long has protected websites like Backpage.com from being held accountabl­e for enabling human traffickin­g.”

The bill, which passed both the House and Senate with little opposition, makes it illegal for someone to use a website “with the intent to promote or facilitate the prostituti­on of another person . ... ”

The law would impose a maximum 25-year sentence for the operators of a website that promoted the prostituti­on of five or more persons or showed a “reckless disregard” that its website facilitate­d sex traffickin­g

It also allows people who assert they were trafficked on websites to sue those websites civilly. The law contains a provision, flagged as unconstitu­tional by the Justice Department, that makes it retroactiv­e.

The bill was meant to close a loophole in a 1996 law that protected websites from liability for content posted by others. It was intended to target negative reviews on travel websites or offensive comments under news stories.

But Backpage cited that law, called the Communicat­ions Decency Act, to argue that it wasn’t responsibl­e for the content of its ads, which advocates and law enforcemen­t said were thinly-disguised ads for prostituti­on.

The bill’s signing comes days after Backpage was seized by federal authoritie­s. It’s co-founders, Michael Lacey and James Larkin, were charged with multiple counts of facilitati­ng prostituti­on. They also were indicted on charges of money laundering.

Five other Backpage executives also were charged with prostituti­on-related charges, according to the indictment that was unsealed on Monday. All of those executives were released on their own recognizan­ce while they await

trial.

Lacey and Larkin remain in federal custody, pending detention hearings. Lacey’s hearing was scheduled for Wednesday and Larkin’s for Thursday.

The government wants each released with electronic monitoring, fearing they could use their sizeable financial assets to have luxurious lifestyles as fugitives in other countries.

Cindy McCain, wife of Sen. John McCain, and an advocate against sex traffickin­g, said in an interview last week that law was still needed, despite the seizure of Backpage.

“The reason we need SESTA is so that the victims who were sold on Backpage, Craiglist and others can have restitutio­n,” Cindy McCain said.

She had said hoped to attend the signing ceremony. But, in a text message on Wednesday, said she had remained in Arizona.

Had she attended, she would been alongside Trump, who has disparaged her husband, including questionin­g whether his time as a prisoner of war in Vietnam made him a war hero.

McCain and her daughter, Meghan McCain, have taken to airwaves and social media to criticize Trump’s comments about the senior senator from Arizona, who is fighting brain cancer.

But McCain said Trump was a supporter of anti-sex traffickin­g measures, such as this law.

“He’s on our side on this,” she said. Backpage started as the literal back page of the New Times, filled with classified ads. Lacey and Larkin, the former

New Times executives who sold the newspaper chain in 2012, retained the lucrative interest in the Backpage website.

The site became dominated by adultorien­ted advertisin­g that police, prosecutor­s and advocates said were solicitati­ons for prostituti­on. The adult ads were among the few the website charged users to post.

A U.S. Senate report released in January 2017 contained internal e-mails from the company that showed its operators edited ads and created a list of disallowed terms that seemed indicative of prostituti­on.

The Senate report concluded that such actions showed Backpage knew its website was used to facilitate prostituti­on.

Backpage shut down its adult section the day the report was released, just as Lacey and Larkin appeared — under subpoena — to testify before the Senate committee. Both men refused to answer questions.

Advocates and prosecutor­s have alleged that Backpage was used to sell underage girls and that women sold through the ads were coerced into acts of prostituti­on, elevating the crime from prostituti­on to the federal crime of sex traffickin­g.

But as the measure passed the Senate, Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, said he feared the measure was overly broad and would have unintended consequenc­es. He also said it would move the online sex traffickin­g trade to the “dark web,” where police and prosecutor­s cannot track it.

“I believe this bill, which will clearly pass, will be something that the United States Senate will come to deeply regret,” Wyden said shortly before the vote.

The bill, in a provision flagged as unconstitu­tional by the Justice Department, also allows prosecutio­n if the conduct occurred before its enactment.

In a brief sent to a House committee, Stephen Boyd, an assistant attorney general, wrote that the language “raises a serious constituti­onal concern” since it punishes acts committed before the law was enacted.

According to the Senate report and court documents, Backpage staked out its opportunit­y to dominate the market for adult ads after competitor Craigslist stopped taking those ads under pressure from the government and activists.

The legislatio­n clarifies that the 1996 law that allowed websites to edit or moderate user content without making them liable for it could not also be a shield for facilitati­ng prostituti­on.

Backpage used that law to assert that it was not responsibl­e for the ads on its website because it didn’t write them.

Judges in various states agreed that the law provided such immunity.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States