The Arizona Republic

EU data privacy law goes into effect for confused companies

- Danica Kirka

LONDON – Lars Andersen’s business handles some of the most sensitive data there is — the names and phone numbers of children.

The owner of London-based My Nametags, which makes personaliz­ed name tags to iron into children’s clothing, says protecting that informatio­n is fundamenta­l to his business, which operates in 130 countries.

But starting Friday, My Nametags and most other companies that collect or process the personal informatio­n of EU residents must take a number of extra precaution­s to comply with the new General Data Protection Regulation, which the EU calls the most sweeping change in data protection rules in a generation.

While the legislatio­n has been applauded for tackling the thorny question of personal data privacy, the rollout is also causing confusion.

Companies are trying to understand what level of protection different informatio­n needs, whether this could force them to change the way they do business and innovate, and how to manage the EU’s 28 national data regulators, who enforce the law.

“Once you try to codify the spirit (of the law) — then you get unintended consequenc­es,” Andersen said. “There’s been a challenge for us: What actually do I have to do? There are a million sort of answers.”

That uncertaint­y, together with stiff penalties for violating the law, has convinced internet-based businesses such as Unroll.me, an inbox management firm, and gaming company Ragnarok Online to block EU users from their sites.

Pottery Barn, an arm of San Francisco-based housewares retailer WilliamsSo­noma Inc., said it would no longer ship to EU addresses. The Los Angeles Times newspaper said it was temporaril­y putting its website off limits in most EU countries.

The implementa­tion of GDPR has also made data protection an issue in contract negotiatio­ns as firms argue about how to divvy up responsibi­lity for any data breach.

“Deals are being held up by data protection,” said Phil Lee, a partner in privacy security and informatio­n at Fieldfishe­r, a law firm with offices in 18 EU cities. “If something goes wrong, what happens?”

EU countries themselves aren’t quite ready for the new rules. Fewer than half of the 28 member states have adopted national laws to implement GDPR, though the laggards are expected to do so in the next few weeks, according to WilmerHale, an internatio­nal law firm.

As with most EU-wide regulation­s, enforcemen­t of the new data protection rules falls to national authoritie­s. While the EU stresses that the law applies to everyone, one of the big outstandin­g questions is whether regulators will go after any entity that breaks the law or simply focus on data giants like Google and Facebook.

Lawyers also say it isn’t yet clear how regulators will interpret the sometimes general language written into the law. For example, the law says processing of personal data must be “fair” and data should be held “no longer than necessary.”

“It’s time to put on your seatbelt and check your airbag,” said D. Reed Freeman Jr., a privacy and cybersecur­ity expert at WilmerHale. “It’s kind of like a lift-off with a rocket. It’s about to launch.”

Andersen of My Nametags said the law has already caused problems for his business.

He has been advised that the company website in the Netherland­s has to be different from the one in the U.K. because the two countries are likely to apply the law differentl­y.

The new law comes at a time when advances in technology make informatio­n more valuable, and therefore raise the stakes in protecting it.

The ability to analyze everything from consumer purchases to medical records holds enormous potential, with suggestion­s that it will make us healthier, improve traffic flows and do other good things for society. At the same time, it provides business with huge new opportunit­ies for profit, with some experts putting the value of the global data economy at $3 trillion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States