The Arizona Republic

Court: Mont. minimizes impact of mining

- Matthew Brown

BILLINGS, Mont. – A gold exploratio­n proposal near Yellowston­e National Park faced a significan­t setback as a judge blamed Montana officials for understati­ng the potential for mining to harm land, water and wildlife.

The ruling released Friday means the Montana Department of Environmen­tal Quality would have to conduct a lengthy environmen­tal review before Lucky Minerals can proceed.

The Vancouver, Canada, company received approval last year to begin searching for gold, copper and other minerals at 23 locations in Emigrant Gulch, a picturesqu­e area of steep mountains and dense forest in southcentr­al Montana’s Paradise Valley. It has a long history of small-scale mining.

The results of the exploratio­n work would guide the company’s future plans for commercial-scale mining.

Environmen­tal groups sued over the project last year on behalf of local residents, who are concerned mining could reduce tourism and pollute the nearby Yellowston­e River.

State Judge Brenda R. Gilbert agreed with the environmen­talists that state officials gave too much deference to the company in considerin­g the project and ignored evidence that water supplies could be damaged.

The agency also should have considered the broader implicatio­ns if Lucky Minerals expands onto federal lands, Gilbert said.

“The granting of the exploratio­n license does set a precedent that would commit the department to the future action of allowing mining,” Gilbert wrote.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States