The Arizona Republic

Trump’s agenda slams into global geopolitic­s

- Ken Thomas

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump’s hard-line views on trade, a staple of his message long before he entered politics, are beginning to collide with the cold realities of global geopolitic­s.

Trade talks on China and the North American Free Trade Agreement have hit stumbling blocks, posing a challenge for a president who vowed to make trade deals more equitable for the United States during his 2016 campaign and who famously tweeted that trade wars are “easy to win.”

Trump’s trade agenda – at least lately – has not been so easy.

After threatenin­g China with $150 billion in tariffs, Trump’s administra­tion has suspended plans to impose the tariffs for now, and the president tweeted Wednesday that a “different structure” would be needed in the trade talks involving the world’s two largest economies.

Trump has bemoaned the massive U.S. trade deficit with China – $337 billion last year – as evidence Beijing has been complicit in abusive trading practices and outsmarted his predecesso­rs.

Pointing to a pause in the trade dispute, the administra­tion pointed to China’s plans to “significan­tly increase” its purchases of U.S. goods and services and make “meaningful increases” in U.S. exports of agricultur­e and energy products. Financial markets, wary of a calamitous trade war, were relieved.

But Beijing did not agree to any specific dollar amounts, despite the Trump administra­tion’s push to lower the U.S. trade deficit by at least $200 billion. And doubts remain about whether China will address allegation­s the Chinese engage in cybertheft of trade secrets, force U.S. companies to transfer some of technology in exchange for market access or back away from the country’s China 2025 plan to dominate emerging technologi­es.

“Chinese r laughing at us again. They have never delivered on 1 promise in the past. Appeasemen­t is the devils friend,” tweeted Dan DiMicco, a former Nucor steel chairman and trade adviser to

Trump’s campaign and transition team, last Monday.

Separately, on Friday, the U.S. reached a deal on ZTE Corp. that will allow the Chinese telecommun­ications giant to remain in business. Under the deal, ZTE will oust its management team, hire American compliance officers and pay a fine – on top of the $1billion it’s already paid for selling equipment to North Korea and Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions. In return, the U.S. Commerce Department will lift a seven-year ban on ZTE buying components from U.S. companies. The ban, imposed this month, threatened to put ZTE out of business.

Trump said earlier that a resolution would help U.S. firms that supply ZTE with components, but members of Congress, including several Republican­s, warned that the U.S. is being too lenient on a company that has violated U.S. sanctions.

“ZTE presents a national security threat to the United States – and nothing in this reported deal addresses that fundamenta­l fact,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat.

Trump’s team, meanwhile, has hit an impasse with Canada and Mexico on negotiatio­ns over NAFTA. The president has sought to overhaul NAFTA as a way of returning automobile production to the U.S. and reducing America’s trade deficit with Mexico.

But the talks are running into the complicati­ons of Mexican elections in July and the U.S. midterm elections in November, along with a dispute over rules for car production.

Seeking leverage, Trump’s administra­tion launched an investigat­ion into whether tariffs might be necessary on car imports, based on national security concerns. The potential penalties could affect Mexico, Canada, Japan and the European Union.

The administra­tion used a similar Commerce Department probe to impose tariffs on imported steel and aluminum. But auto manufactur­ers said they didn’t push for the auto investigat­ion, and members of Congress questioned the validity of the probe.

 ?? AP ?? President Donald Trump famously tweeted that trade wars are “easy to win.”
AP President Donald Trump famously tweeted that trade wars are “easy to win.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States