The Arizona Republic

The fallacy of the supposed $1 billion loss to education

- Your Turn Sean McCarthy Guest columnist Sean McCarthy is senior research analyst at the Arizona Tax Research Associatio­n. Reach him at smccarthy@arizonatax.org; on Twitter, @SeanMc CarthyAZ.

K-12 education in Arizona is missing a billion dollars. The phrase is repeated so frequently the media mimics it without understand­ing its meaning. The trouble is, it’s rhetoric — not fact.

Total K-12 spending a decade ago was $9.7 billion for $9,263 per pupil and the estimate for today (not including the recently passed state budget) is $10.9 billion at $9,774 per pupil, according to Joint Legislativ­e Budget Committee.

Advocates calculate the one billion figure with misleading math. They take total spending from FY 2008 and adjust every single fund source for inflation through today. Every fund! This despite there being no voter requiremen­t to inflate anything other than the equalizati­on formula. This twisted measuremen­t curiously begins its analysis 11 years ago during the economic fantasylan­d of 2007.

Plainly, there is no mechanism to inflate every fund that goes to K-12. Is the Legislatur­e responsibl­e to inflate the more than $1 billion the feds provide? The money the state spends on new school constructi­on is based on district growth; not an automatic adjustment for inflation. Bonds and overrides are local matters and depend on voter approval. There are hundreds of millions in non-formula programs that are capped or otherwise limited. Measuring the state’s commitment to education in this manner is intentiona­lly unreachabl­e.

If Arizona is to grade itself this way, it must annually pay for population and inflation, plus a new amount on top of that to account for the billions that are not inflated. The Legislatur­e recently added $400 million to K-12 on top of inflation and population growth for FY 2019. But if they do not further inflate funds outside their control, the budget will undoubtedl­y be called a “cut to K-12” in FY 2020 using this measuremen­t.

This isn’t to say K-12 wasn’t cut during the recession. Like the rest of government and ordinary Arizonans, everyone took a haircut. K-12 lost significan­t money in capital funding. It’s easy to forget in a sunny day in 2018 that Arizona lost 40 percent of all state generalfun­d revenue between 2008 and 2010. The Legislatur­e ignored the advice of economists in 2007 and passed an unsustaina­ble state budget for FY 2008 that was 60 percent larger than it was just five years earlier.

A fair way to measure the state’s K-12 appropriat­ion would be to adjust the equalizati­on formula by inflation and pupils. The equalizati­on formula is the bedrock of the K-12 finance formula and is what the voters directed the Legislatur­e to inflate. Adjusting for inflation and pupils, the equalizati­on formula for next year will be roughly $160 million shy of what it was a decade ago. Advocates have legitimate facts they can use; there’s no need for tortured analysis.

Measuring inputs to K-12 by adjusting every line item for inflation is the ultimate carrot-in-front-of-the-horse routine. Worse than misguided rhetoric, the billion-dollar claim is insulting to taxpayers because it ensures their investment will forever be described as inadequate.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States