The Arizona Republic

Fake military recruiters collect data

- Rebekah L. Sanders

At least 13 fake military recruitmen­t websites tricked potentiall­y millions of people into giving their contact informatio­n to telemarket­ers, according to a complaint by the Federal Trade Commission.

The sites falsely claimed they would not share personal informatio­n.

In reality, the telemarket­ers sold the personal informatio­n to other marketing companies and contacted people who submitted informatio­n to promote “military friendly” colleges instead of military service, the FTC lawsuit said.

The copycat websites, which included www.army.com and www.navyenlist.com, looked similar to official military recruiting websites, were featured in online ads when people searched how to join the military and did not clearly notify visitors that the sites were not sanctioned by any U.S. military branch, the complaint said.

“When schools and marketers collude to steer young people away from military service, it enriches them but costs all of us,” Federal Trade Commission­ers Rohit Chopra and Rebecca Kelly said in a written statement. “The fake military recruiting scheme ... harmed young people looking to serve their country, as well as the public more broadly. Not only was the alleged conduct unlawful, it was also un-American.”

The case illustrate­s a disturbing trend of marketing companies using deceptive tactics to collect personal informatio­n, the commission­ers said.

The “lead generation” industry makes money by harvesting vast amounts of personal data on Americans to sell to companies or schools looking for new customers or students, Chopra and Kelly wrote.

Companies and schools purchasing leads need to work harder to ensure informatio­n is obtained legally and ethically, the commission­ers said.

Too many are “turning a blind eye,” the commission­ers said.

“Their failure to oversee their vendors raises serious concerns,” Chopra and Kelly wrote. “We should all be worried that some institutio­ns of higher education see students as nothing more than potential revenue and are willing to turn to outfits employing unsavory tactics to meet their financial objectives.”

The lawsuit mentioned one college involved in the scam: Grantham University, an online, for-profit school based in Kansas.

The names of other schools listed in the lawsuit were redacted.

Chopra and Kelly called on the fivemember commission to vote “in the public interest” to release the names of all schools and companies that purchased informatio­n from the fake military-recruitmen­t websites.

The defendants were Christophe­r Upp, Mark Van Dyke, Lon Brolliar and Andrew Dorman with the companies Sun Key Publishing, Fanmail.com and WhereData.

A U.S. District judge ordered the defendants to pay more than $12 million in fines and stop using websites to deceive customers.

However, the fines will largely be suspended because of the defendants’ inability to pay, the FTC said.

The scam sites used these addresses: ❚ www.army.com

❚ www.armyreserv­es.com

❚ www.armyenlist.com

❚ www.navyenlist.com

❚ www.marinesenl­ist.com

❚ www.coastguard­enlist.com

❚ www.airforceen­list.com

❚ www.nationagua­rdenlist.com

❚ www.air-force.com

❚ www.airforce.army.com

❚ www.navy.army.com

❚ www.marinecorp­s.army.com

❚ www.nationalgu­ard.army.com

The websites attracted more than 100,000 unique visitors per month, the FTC said. Some sites were active as far back as 2010.

Online ads for the websites used phrases such as “The Army wants you!” and “Join U.S. Army Reserves,” the lawsuit stated.

Telemarket­ers hired by the defendants made millions of calls to people who signed up on the websites, frequently violating the federal Do Not Call registry, according to the FTC.

In some cases the telemarket­ers pretended to be military officials, the FTC alleged.

The defendants also sold contact informatio­n to other marketing companies for $15 to $40 per person, the complaint said.

“(T)his was all a ruse,” Chopra and Kelly said. “While it is difficult to quantify the damage done to Americans whose dreams were crushed or whose time and money were wasted, there is no question that the injury was substantia­l and cannot be undone.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States