The Arizona Republic

Court rejects Trump effort to end DACA

- Richard Wolf and Alan Gomez

WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that President Donald Trump cannot end an Obama administra­tion program that protects undocument­ed immigrants brought to the United States as children.

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit agreed with a federal district judge’s decision in January that Trump lacked the authority to eliminate the program — a proposal the president made last year in hopes of prodding Congress to act.

“Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their claim that the rescission of DACA

— at least as justified on this record — is arbitrary, capricious or otherwise not in accordance with law,” the three-member panel said.

“In a world where the government can remove only a small percentage of the undocument­ed noncitizen­s present in this country in any year,” the panel said, DACA lets it “devote much-needed resources to enforcemen­t priorities such as threats to national security, rather than blameless and economical­ly productive young people with clean criminal records.”

The decision leaves in place for now the popular Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program known as DACA, which has protected more than 700,000 undocument­ed immigrants from deportatio­n and enabled them to get work permits.

The court noted it was created because of the “cruelty and wastefulne­ss of deporting productive young people to countries with which they have no ties.”

But the Justice Department is likely to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court, which now has five reliably conservati­ve justices. The high court in February refused to leapfrog the appeals court’s review of Judge William Alsup’s decision.

“In California and across our nation, Dreamers significan­tly enrich our communitie­s as scholars, entreprene­urs, first responders and much more,” California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said. “This fight, of course, is far from over. We will continue to defend Dreamers and DACA all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary.”

Two other federal appeals courts also are reviewing the dispute between the Trump administra­tion and the states, local government­s and immigrant rights groups fighting to maintain the program.

Sanaa Abrar, advocacy director for United We Dream, a youth-led immigratio­n advocacy group, predicted that those rulings will come to the same conclusion.

“Another federal court has said what we’ve always known: that Trump’s decision to kill DACA was wrong and that his sole motivation was to deport 800,000 people of color,” Abrar said in a statement.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States