The Arizona Republic

Senators stand together for tomatoes

- Russ Wiles Reach the reporter at 602-444-8616 or russ.wiles@arizonarep­ublic.com.

Arizona’s two U.S. senators have found common ground in a simmering trade dispute over tomatoes.

Republican Martha McSally and Democrat Kyrsten Sinema expressed concern about a federal plan to intensify inspection­s of Mexican-grown tomatoes entering the country, largely through the major produce-shipment port at Nogales.

The two senators in a letter Tuesday said the proposed regulation­s were “unworkable” and would hurt Arizona’s economy by requiring every lot of fresh tomatoes imported from Mexico to be inspected at the border, up from a small fraction currently.

The proposal also wouldn’t allow American importers to be compensate­d by suppliers for tomatoes rejected for poor quality, as is currently the case, they said.

The Commerce Department in July proposed heightened inspection­s against the wishes of American importers, Mexican growers and the Mexican government, which recently threatened to retaliate by inspecting more U.S. produce, meats, grains and other agricultur­al products.

McSally and Sinema contend more inspection­s wouldn’t make sense.

“Imposing unnecessar­y costs and burdens on the fresh-produce trade hurts the economy of Arizona and eliminates jobs in the state,” the senators wrote in their letter to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross. “Ensuring that this trade continues as freely and robustly as possible is a top priority for us.”

The senators argued that there is no legitimate commercial justificat­ion for a 100% inspection mandate. Rather, such a policy “would just serve as an artificial barrier to trade,” they said, adding that it could impose $270 million in added costs and antagonize the Mexican government to impose reciprocal inspection­s on U.S. exports.

“A full-inspection mandate is particular­ly ill-advised at a time when the land ports of entry are facing delays from staffing and infrastruc­ture shortages,” the letter continued.

Currently, about 8% of Mexicangro­wn tomatoes are inspected, said Lance Jungmeyer, president of the Fresh Produce Associatio­n of the Americas, a group in Nogales, Arizona, that represents roughly 120 importers, transporta­tion companies and other businesses engaged in the cross-border produce trade.

There’s no specific deadline as to when the increased inspection­s might begin, as negotiatio­ns continue between the U.S. and Mexican government­s.

More warehouses needed

The $270 million in added costs attributed to increased inspection­s would include about $220 million for the constructi­on of new warehouses to store produce as it awaits examinatio­n, along with $25 million for inspectors and $20 million for increased warehouse staff, Jungmeyer said.

“Inspection­s have nothing to do with health issues, pests or stopping drugs,” he said. “Inspectors are there only to ensure that good-quality tomatoes are being sold.”

The Fresh Produce Associatio­n contends heightened inspection­s of Mexican tomatoes would accomplish nothing because 99% of tomatoes already meet quality standards. But delays of up to 72 hours due to increased inspection­s could result in less-fresh tomatoes arriving in American stores, the associatio­n added.

Some or most of those costs could be passed along to consumers. Tomato prices also will be pressured from the recent imposition of a 17.56% duty on tomatoes imported from Mexico.

The Fresh Produce Associatio­n accuses the Florida Tomato Exchange, which represents growers there, of falsely claiming that increased inspection­s wouldn’t impact the flow of trade.

“Many of our members are dismayed because they believe that Commerce has not verified the claims made by the FTE and are acting solely upon accusation­s that we know are untrue,” Jungmeyer said.

A call to the Florida Tomato Exchange wasn’t immediatel­y returned.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States