The Arizona Republic

Petersen challenges supervisor­s in fight to keep job

- Jessica Boehm

Paul Petersen won’t leave his Maricopa County assessor position without a fight — and he’s picked a big one with the county officials who suspended him last month.

Petersen is facing dozens of felony charges across three states related to his private sector job as an adoption attorney. Prosecutor­s allege that he broke an internatio­nal treaty as well as state and federal fraud and human smuggling laws when he flew pregnant Marshalles­e women to the U.S. to give birth and then coordinate­d their adoptions.

Petersen, a Republican, is also an elected official. He’s served as the Maricopa County assessor since 2013. None of the charges he faces pertain to his work as county assessor.

Still, when news broke of Petersen’s arrest, other county elected officials encouraged him to resign. When he did not, they began meeting with the county attorney to determine whether they could force him out of office.

The Board of Supervisor­s is the

“The hearing before the Board of Supervisor­s will obviously be a farce, so we’ll go to court afterwards. Once we’re in a neutral forum and have subpoena power, Paul has good odds.”

Kory Langhofer Attorney for Maricopa County Assessor Paul Petersen

central governing body for the county, but it typically cannot remove other elected officials, like Petersen, from office.

But, the supervisor­s thought they found a work-around. State law gives the board authority to suspend the assessor for up to 120 days for “neglect of duty.” The supervisor­s said they believe Petersen’s absence from office while in custody for three weeks, along with details about his performanc­e found through an audit, qualify as neglect of duty.

They’re now facing the wrath of Petersen’s attorney for that decision.

Prominent GOP attorney Kory Langhofer is asking for a slew of documents from the county in hopes of showing that the very elected officials who suspended Petersen may have committed “neglect of duty” themselves.

Supervisor­s asked to testify

Last week, Petersen appealed his suspension and requested a hearing before the board to argue for a reconsider­ation, which is permitted under state law.

In the letter appealing the suspension, Langhofer criticized an audit conducted by the county that determined Petersen had used his county computer and phone to conduct personal business.

He suggested the Board of Supervisor­s open itself up to a similar audit.

In a four-page letter to newly appointed Maricopa County Attorney Allister Adel on Tuesday, Langhofer requested that she require all of the county supervisor­s, Treasurer Royce Flora, Recorder Adrian Fontes, Sheriff Paul Penzone, Chief Deputy Assessor Timothy Boncoskey, Assistant Chief Deputy Assessor Lesley Kratz, county spokesman Fields Moseley, Assistant Maricopa County Attorney Thomas Liddy and Adel to testify at Petersen’s hearing.

He also requested the following records:

❚ All documents related or referring to Petersen created by the board or County Attorney’s Office between Oct. 9-Nov. 12.

❚ All communicat­ion between or among the board and County Attorney’s Office related or referring to Petersen between Oct. 9-Nov. 12.

❚ Parking records and other documents that show how frequently the supervisor­s, Penzone, Fontes, Flora and Adel were in county buildings from Jan. 1-Nov. 12.

❚ Copies of the hard drives of all computers, cellphones and other county devices issued to the supervisor­s, Penzone, Fontes, Flora and Adel.

❚ Copies of policies approved by the board related to the county attorney or county assessor’s offices.

The Arizona Republic had requested the parking logs for all of the same officials on Oct. 30 but has not yet received the records.

Langhofer notes that he would be willing to forgo the document requests and witness testimony if the board instead agrees to the following as facts:

❚ The supervisor­s, Penzone, Fontes, Flora and Adel “typically are physically present in Maricopa County offices or facilities for less than 40 hours per week.”

❚ The supervisor­s, Penzone, Fontes, Flora and Adel routinely send or receive emails unrelated to official business or visit internet websites unrelated to official business during work hours.

❚ The board’s primary reason for suspending Petersen was that he “was alleged to have engaged in certain unlawful conduct in connection with his private law practice.”

❚ The duties and responsibi­lities of the County Assessor’s Office “have been adequately and lawfully carried out.”

Hearing on Dec. 11

On Wednesday afternoon, the Board of Supervisor­s scheduled Petersen’s appeal hearing for 1 p.m. Dec. 11.

“We’re going to be deciding whether the suspension should stand,” Chairman Bill Gates said. “This is not about other county officers.”

The supervisor­s also voted to ask Adel to complete an investigat­ion into Petersen’s “neglect of duty.”

In response to Langhofer’s letter, Gates said Petersen’s attorney can call witnesses, but he does not have subpoena power in this appeal process and therefore cannot compel witnesses, including the supervisor­s, to testify.

As for Langhofer’s records requests, Gates said the county plans to turn over “all of those records that they’re entitled to.” He would not clarify which records Petersen would not be entitled to.

Langhofer said in a statement following the board’s decision that he is looking for a fair investigat­ion and hearing, but “the hearing before the Board of Supervisor­s will obviously be a farce, so we’ll go to court afterwards.”

“Once we’re in a neutral forum and have subpoena power, Paul has good odds,” he said.

Petersen is scheduled Friday to make an initial court appearance in Utah. He’s already had arraignmen­ts in Arizona and Arkansas.

 ??  ?? Petersen
Petersen

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States