The Arizona Republic

Supervisor­s uphold Petersen’s suspension

Embattled county assessor may sue to be reinstated

- Jessica Boehm

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisor­s voted to sustain Maricopa County Assessor Paul Petersen’s suspension — possibly setting up a lawsuit between the county and the embattled elected official.

The board suspended Petersen in late October following Petersen’s arrest on dozens of felony charges related to his private sector job as an adoption attorney.

Petersen appealed the suspension. After weeks of deliberati­on, the board decided to keep the suspension in place and voted to recommend that the county attorney pursue Petersen’s removal for willful misconduct while in office.

Petersen’s attorneys have indicated they may take the supervisor­s to court over the decision.

The Board of Supervisor­s is the central governing body for the county, but it typically cannot remove other elected officials, such as Petersen, from office.

However, state law does give the board authority to suspend the assessor for up to 120 days for “neglect of duty.” The supervisor­s said they believe Petersen’s absence from office while incarcerat­ed for nearly three weeks in October qualifies as neglect of duty.

The supervisor­s also commission­ed a review of Petersen’s computer files that showed Petersen used his county computer to perform duties related to his private law business.

During Friday’s meeting, Chairman Bill Gates revealed additional informatio­n found on Petersen’s county laptop, including “shocking” text messages that appeared to show Petersen threatenin­g birth mothers who wanted to back out of adoptions.

Petersen faces felony charges in Arizona, Arkansas and Utah. In Arizona, he is accused of illegally arranging for 28 pregnant women from the Marshall Islands to fly to Arizona, to live in a

house he owns and to deliver their babies — paid for by the state’s Medicaid system — before placing them for adoption.

Petersen has pleaded not guilty to all charges. He was released from custody after posting bail in late October.

Report: Petersen’s laptop wiped

Consultant­s hired by the county to review Petersen’s work performanc­e released a supplement­al report Friday that shows Petersen’s county laptop was wiped before it was seized by investigat­ors.

The Microsoft Surface laptop, which was purchased by the county for Petersen for $2,199 in 2017, was wiped twice, according to investigat­ors: once the day after he was released from custody and again on Nov. 12, after he had appealed his suspension.

The county attorney asked Petersen to turn over the laptop for the county’s investigat­ion on Nov. 13. Petersen’s attorneys said he would, but he did not.

Investigat­ors found that days after the county requested Petersen to turn over the laptop, someone used the laptop to search for “uninstall Microsoft Word,” “remove cookies” and “uninstall Microsoft Edge.”

The two “factory resets” of the computer destroyed most of the data that was once stored on the laptop, according to investigat­ors. But the computer was linked to a cloud storage system, which allowed investigat­ors to recover a “small amount of data.”

Investigat­ors found that wiping the laptop may have been a criminal act. In the report, they wrote that the removal of data from the laptop may constitute destructio­n of public records and tampering of evidence.

The Arizona Attorney General’s Office seized the laptop after obtaining a search warrant on Dec. 3.

‘All you girls work for me’

In the recovered data, investigat­ors said they found more evidence that Petersen used his county computer to perform duties related to his private law office, including:

❚ A text message stating, “All you girls work for me, not the other way around.”

❚ A text message advising a woman that if she backed out of an adoption, he would remove his name from her apartment lease, causing her to be evicted.

❚ A text message stating that Petersen could sever the parental rights of a father who wouldn’t sign adoption papers.

❚ A letter to the Indiana Department of Health Services about Medicaid qualificat­ions for a pregnant mother.

❚ Documents showing multiple bank transfers to Lynwood Jennet, Petersen’s co-defendant in his Arizona criminal case.

❚ Tax forms from Petersen’s law office issued to some of the individual­s named in the criminal indictment against Petersen.

“Mr. Petersen also has a duty to protect county property, and he failed to fulfill that duty when he allowed that county computer to be used for that private adoption practice,” Gates said during Friday’s meeting.

What happens next?

The Board of Supervisor­s could end up in court for its decision to suspend Petersen.

Prior to the board’s Friday vote, Petersen’s political attorney Kory Langhofer said he intended to sue the board unless it reversed Petersen’s suspension.

Langhofer did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment Friday.

But the 120-day suspension — which is half-way over — may be just the beginning for Petersen. The board also voted unanimousl­y to recommend County Attorney Allister Adel pursue removing Petersen from office permanentl­y.

State law allows for the county attorney to call a grand jury to consider “willful or corrupt misconduct in office.” If the grand jury decides to accuse Petersen of misconduct, the issue would go to a trial where a jury would decide whether he should be removed from office.

In a statement, Adel said, “I am currently taking the motion by the board under review and determinin­g next steps.”

If Adel does not decide to pursue removal, Petersen’s suspension will stop at the end of February and he will be allowed to return to work.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States