The Arizona Republic

Independen­ts, act now or be quiet

- Abe Kwok Columnist Reach columnist Abe Kwok at akwok@azcentral.com. On Twitter: @abekwok.

Not a few independen­ts cried voter suppressio­n following Arizona’s 2016 Presidenti­al Preference Election.

And not a few of them will utter the same cry again come the Democratic presidenti­al primary on March 17.

In particular those who will switch their political affiliatio­n, but won’t do it in time to qualify to vote.

Or those who won’t have switched affiliatio­n and will get turned away at the polls. Or the ones who will insist on casting a provisiona­l ballot anyway, only to have their ballot tossed.

There’ll be unhappy campers. You can all but take that to the bank.

I sympathize up to a point. Arizona’s voting rules on primaries can be confusing and stultifyin­g, and they mostly impact independen­t voters, who account for a third of the state’s nearly 4 million registered voters. More on that in a moment.

But none of this restricted access – whether you consider it major voter disenfranc­hisement or minor inconvenie­nce – is a fait accompli unless you permit it, either through ignorance or apathy.

So consider this a gentle reminder. If you’re an independen­t – that is, registered as Party Not Designated – and want to have a say in on who the Democratic presidenti­al nominee should be, you need to:

1) switch your registrati­on to Democrat;

2) and do it by Feb. 18.

That goes for dissatisfi­ed Republican­s, as well. (The Arizona GOP canceled the Republican Presidenti­al Preference Election given Donald Trump is running for a second term, a move that may trigger a few cries of voter suppressio­n on its own.)

After Feb. 18, you’re out of luck. And it’d be on you.

Lest you forget, a call last year for the Arizona Democratic Party to open the presidenti­al primary failed, even if the argument to do so has strong merits.

Namely, that Arizona allows independen­ts to vote in all other state primary elections, just not the Presidenti­al Preference Elections, thereby creating a confusing two-tier system. And that the millions of dollars in costs to hold the presidenti­al primaries are borne by taxpayers, not the two dominant political parties.

The confusion may not be huge, but it’s real. More than 18,000 independen­ts showed up to vote in the 2016 Presidenti­al Preference Elections, based on the number of provisiona­l ballots rejected.

Yes, it’s a pain for independen­ts to have to switch for the once-every-fouryears exercise – and then having to switch back afterwards – but it seems a small price for the admission to what is otherwise a partisan exercise.

I don’t subscribe to the belief that Arizona’s rules amount to voter suppressio­n, even if the state can and should act to make them more clear and consistent. Until it does, independen­ts can reregister their affiliatio­n to have their say on a Democratic challenger to Trump, provided they act by Feb. 18.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States