The Arizona Republic

City Council approves broad strategy to address homelessne­ss in Phoenix

- Jessica Boehm Arizona Republic USA TODAY NETWORK

The Phoenix City Council Tuesday approved a broad list of strategies to address the burgeoning homelessne­ss crisis in the city.

The plan, requested by Mayor Kate Gallego earlier this year, calls for a regional distributi­on of homeless shelters and resources, more affordable housing options, enhanced neighborho­od encampment cleanups and more mental health services.

Maricopa County is facing record numbers of people experienci­ng homelessne­ss. According to the most recent point-in-time count, more than 7,400 people are experienci­ng homelessne­ss. More than half of those are not living in a shelter and instead stay on the streets, in vehicles or in other areas not meant for habitation.

For decades, Phoenix leaders have criticized the state, Maricopa County and suburban cities for not providing adequate support for homelessne­ss services and forcing Phoenix to carry the burden for the entire region.

When Gallego called for a homelessne­ss plan earlier this year, she said she hoped Phoenix’s renewed commitment to ending homelessne­ss will force the hands of other levels of government to take on the challenge as well.

“We are stepping up to do more and

we look forward to every other level of government stepping up to do more,” Gallego said before Tuesday’s vote.

The plan includes a list of ideas for how to address a range of overarchin­g issues that contribute to homelessne­ss, like housing affordabil­ity and mental health. But few of the strategies had specific deadlines or funding attached to them.

The council approved the plan unanimousl­y, but many council members pushed staff to provide clearer timelines and budgetary informatio­n.

About a dozen homelessne­ss services providers, advocates and community members provided mostly positive feedback about the city’s commitment to helping people find permanent housing and minimizing the impact of homelessne­ss on neighborho­ods.

But there was a resounding caveat that the plan only will be worthwhile if its strategies are actually implemente­d.

“(Remember), this is just a framework. Now the real work really begins,” Darlene Newsom, UMOM chief executive, said.

Homelessne­ss strategies

Here are the plan’s goals and some of the strategies the Phoenix City Council believes will accomplish those goals.

Read the full report and all of the strategies on the city of Phoenix website.

Outreach and resources

Goal: “To connect those experienci­ng homelessne­ss to outreach and resources to assist in resolving their homelessne­ss.”

Strategies:

● Fund dedicated mental health outreach teams.

● Coordinate a bi-annual resource day for homeless LGBTQ+ community.

● Work with school districts to identify families on the brink of homelessne­ss and connect them with appropriat­e services.

● Provide funding to relocate and transition­ally house veterans and support the U.S. Vets program.

Mental health

Goal: “Connect individual­s experienci­ng homelessne­ss to affordable and appropriat­e behavioral health and substance abuse services.”

Strategies:

● Support the Arizona Department of Housing’s initiative to renovate the Birch Building on the Arizona State Hospital grounds to provide approximat­ely 50 units of transition­al shelter for people experienci­ng homelessne­ss with mental health conditions.

● Provide a service resource navigator near the Municipal Court arraignmen­t courtrooms to speak with individual­s appearing for arraignmen­t who could benefit from homeless, substance abuse or general mental health resources.

● Advocate for Medicaid to allow funding to be used for mental health facilities with more than 16 beds.

Workforce developmen­t

Goal: “Increase employment and economic opportunit­ies for job seekers experienci­ng homelessne­ss.”

Strategies:

Provide career and work readiness services to individual­s experienci­ng homelessne­ss through a Workforce Developmen­t Specialist in the Homeless Services Division.

● Increase the economic security for individual­s experienci­ng homelessne­ss through employment opportunit­ies, education, training, and supportive services.

Eviction protection

Goal: “Prevent the loss of housing through eviction prevention.” Strategies:

● Partner with the Arizona Department of Housing to utilize its rent assistance funds for Phoenix residents.

● Work with federal partners and advocacy groups to include more low- to moderate-income families and individual­s in eviction protection programs.

Shelters

Goal: “Provide adequate, accessible, smaller and specialize­d shelters and temporary housing for persons experienci­ng homelessne­ss. Also, support and expand bridge and transition­al housing opportunit­ies for persons requiring additional medical, behavioral health, or other intensive supportive services before moving to permanent housing.” Strategies:

● Increase funding and resources for shelter facilities.

● Partner with nonprofits and health care organizati­ons to expand successful, specialty shelter models.

● Identify vacant buildings that can be repurposed to provide shelter facilities.

● Create and implement a

regional

strategy to increase the number of emergency and low-barrier shelter beds across metro Phoenix.

Permanent supportive housing

Goal: “Expand options and efficientl­y utilize Permanent Supportive Housing opportunit­ies for persons experienci­ng homelessne­ss.”

Strategies:

● Pressure the Arizona Veterans Administra­tion to provide additional referrals to fill unused veteran housing vouchers.

● Encourage more landlords to participat­e in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher program by streamlini­ng contract processes, inspection­s, notificati­ons and payments to landlords.

Affordable housing

Goal: Increase the availabili­ty of housing for Phoenix residents at all income levels by implementi­ng the nine strategies in the Housing Phoenix Plan to create or preserve 50,000 housing units by 2030.

Strategies:

● Redevelop city-owned land for affordable housing.

● Find alternativ­e funding for affordable housing.

● Debunk myths about affordable housing and people who need subsidized housing.

Reduce barriers for developers to construct affordable housing.

Encampment cleanups

sources

Goal: “Maintain a healthy and safe environmen­t in public right-of-way including streets, alleyways, parks and parks preserves.”

Strategies:

● Hire additional staff to focus efforts on biohazard cleanup.

● Contract a private vendor to work with Human Services Campus for weekly cleanups.

● Research and identify partnershi­ps for homeless rehabilita­tion/ticket/restitutio­n program that helps with cleanups.

● Hire permanent staff to take on coordinati­on and reporting roles for the cleanup effort.

Neighborho­ods

Goal: “More effectivel­y engage neighborho­ods to identify the issues they are experienci­ng and develop solutions.”

Strategies:

● Provide clear, easy-to-follow instructio­ns for requesting help from multiple city department­s.

● Use data to determine hot spots for encampment­s and other issues to directly engage with impacted neighborho­ods.

● Continue to implement and evaluate the Gated Alley Program Pilot.

● Explore partnershi­p opportunit­ies to address public restrooms and waste receptacle­s in supportive neighborho­ods.

Neighborho­od leaders point out their concerns

A number of neighborho­od leaders weighed in on the homelessne­ss plan with cautious optimism.

Homelessne­ss has caused tension in many neighborho­ods because of the blight associated with encampment­s and concerns about crime and mental health issues in parks and residentia­l communitie­s.

Community leaders from across the city said they were happy to see the city’s commitment to including neighborho­od groups in decision making about homelessne­ss.

But, they said they were concerned that the plan did not outline how to push people to get addiction or mental health treatment when they refuse.

“One area where we still have concerns is in the area of accountabi­lity — accountabi­lity of individual­s who receive services and accountabi­lity of services providers themselves,” Spellman said.

Eva Olivas, a neighborho­od leader in the area surroundin­g the Human Services Campus, said her community has asked the city to help lessen the burden of homelessne­ss on neighborho­ods for decades and it still feels like the council isn’t listening.

She said the plan lacked a real commitment to the neighborho­ods to help clean up trash and reduce crime.

“I feel like our voices continue to fall on deaf ears. This is history repeating itself,” Olivas said.

St. Luke’s as homeless shelter?

After voting on the homeless plan, the council considered a request from council members Thelda Williams, Sal DiCiccio and Michael Nowakowksi to direct city staff to look into using the now-closed St. Luke’s Medical Center as a homeless shelter and mental health treatment center.

St. Luke’s closed in late 2019 because of a lack of patients.

DiCiccio posted on Twitter a few weeks ago saying he wanted to move the Human Services Campus — the largest homeless campus in the state that shelters about 450 people a night — to the closed 9-story St. Luke’s building.

Amy Schwabenle­nder, the executive director of the Human Services Campus, said DiCiccio had not discussed St. Luke’s with her. The Human Services Campus owns the property where it cur

rently operates and has no plans to relocate, she said.

City Manager Ed Zuercher said St. Luke’s campus sold to a private investment group a few years ago for more than $100 million. It’s not clear if the current owner wants to sell or how much it would cost now.

After concerns about the cost and viability of St. Luke’s, DiCiccio, Nowakowski and Williams agreed to ditch the St. Luke’s portion of their request.

DiCiccio, Nowakowski and Williams also requested staff to look at pursuing a “cost-sharing agreement” with Maricopa County and the state of Arizona to make sure they are contributi­ng “their fair share towards addressing (homelessne­ss and behavioral health) issues.”

The city cannot force the state and county into a cost-sharing agreement and it’s not clear that either entity would be willing to do so.

Some council members were skeptical that an agreement would be possible but ultimately agreed to allow staff to pursue a cost-sharing agreement with the state, county and other cities on behavioral health and homelessne­ss issues.

 ?? ELI IMADALI/THE REPUBLIC ?? People experienci­ng homelessne­ss move belongings during a cleanup of an encampment in February.
ELI IMADALI/THE REPUBLIC People experienci­ng homelessne­ss move belongings during a cleanup of an encampment in February.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States