The Arizona Republic

Phoenix needs input of homeless people on restrictio­ns

- Your Turn Ricardo Millhouse Guest columnist Ricardo Millhouse is a humanistic social scientist and a PhD candidate in the School of Social Transforma­tion at Arizona State University. He is an associate at the architectu­ral and design firm Gould Evans in

Most bus stops across Phoenix have replaced benches with individual seating structures to reduce the likelihood of someone sleeping. A number of exit, onramps and vacant lots have “no trespassin­g” signs posted on state property to deter people from the areas.

The public is told where walking, resting and congregati­ng can and cannot happen within public space. However, vulnerable population­s, including people who are unhoused, are often directly and indirectly removed from public areas and excluded from decisions about what happens to public features.

The city of Phoenix retroactiv­ely gave the public an avenue to express their voices about the approved Strategies to Address Homelessne­ss Plan. It provided surveys to people experienci­ng homelessne­ss and people who are not — surveys meant to identify social needs. The homelessne­ss plan focuses on service priorities and sustainabl­e strategies that produce solutions for those experienci­ng homelessne­ss and communitie­s impacted by encampment­s. My hope is that the plan:

will not be cloaked in fear of potential criminaliz­ation

● will not privilege the who are not experienci­ng exclusivel­y

● recommits to community collaborat­ion between the city council, Phoenix boards and committees, as well as community groups, to co-develop innovative strategies in support of the needs of all people in Phoenix, including those who are unsheltere­d.

My concern about the fear of criminaliz­ation stems from Section C.1.1. of the plan which says, “additional staff resources [are] needed to coordinate and track alley encampment­s and PHX CARES program services.” This action item is vague, as it allows Phoenix to collect data about where encampment­s are located.

The public should clearly understand what Phoenix Parks and Recreation Department, Phoenix CARES and the Phoenix Police Department will do with the data. Remember, the parks and recreation department’s motto is “Clean. population homelessne­ss,

Safe. Accessible.” The public assumes a whole community and that their work should be dedicated to everyone; the public should hold them accountabl­e to their motto.

Recently, the Phoenix Community Alliance, of which I am a member, hosted a community forum to recommit Phoenix to the social infrastruc­ture of homelessne­ss and supportive housing initiative­s. The city council will develop a community action group to work with the public on additional outreach efforts.

One solution to address the balance of public use and safety for all people requires the community action group to commit to collaborat­ion, justice and equity in its outreach efforts and solutions.

The group should aim to produce inclusive public space designs, involving landscape and architectu­ral designers with expertise in public design solutions, as well as community leaders and organizati­ons that work directly with unsheltere­d population­s. The group should propose data-driven design solutions that address public needs, including the health, safety and welfare of unsheltere­d people.

We the public are not unsuscepti­ble to experienci­ng homelessne­ss, especially in times of pandemic. In January 2019, Maricopa Associatio­n of Government­s reported 6,614 people experienci­ng homelessne­ss. In the same year, the unsheltere­d population (people living on the streets, in dry rivers, cars, etc.) reached 50% of the overall population of people experienci­ng homelessne­ss and this number continues to rise.

The public has an obligation to hold the city accountabl­e to its residents. Policies have historical­ly displaced vulnerable people, including the unhoused.

Current state and local policies, such as the Strategies to Address Homelessne­ss Plan, attempt to protect vulnerable people. But there must be more city-directed efforts to develop design solutions and data-driven policies that consciousl­y minimize the risk of unsheltere­d people and support the social needs of residents.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States