The Arizona Republic

TELL ME ABOUT IT

-

Hello, Carolyn: I’m a 72-year-old male and consider myself a feminist in the sense of equality.

Not infrequent­ly, and more so in medical facilities for some reason, I have interacted with women who refer to other female employees as girls: “Give these papers to the girl at the front desk,” or some such.

Since they may not see me cringe, hidden by my masks, what can I say to object? Not to offend, but still make it clear this is really demeaning? I know they are working hard, but, really?

– L.

L.: You, a man, cannot tell women what does or does not demean them. Because that is demeaning, to suggest they cannot think for or competentl­y represent themselves.

Also, women can use “girl” because it’s their sex, and the term is meant to diminish them; they can adopt it or co-opt it as they please.

They also may very well say “guy” in analogous situations, which would make “girl” perfectly fine by the standards you’re applying. Man/woman, gentleman/lady, guy/girl, boy/girl, male/female – all pass the gender-bias test when used in matched sets. It’s the persistent use of man/girl, or man/lady, man/ female - or woman/guy! - that gets a soul into trouble.

If you don’t know whether these women use “guy” in the same context, because there has never actually been a “guy” at the front desk or window or counter to whom you’ve given your papers? Then a feminist man concerned about equal opportunit­y for women might want to make the ongoing, disproport­ionate reliance on women to fill what are generally low-paid, dead-end, public-facing, crucial clerical positions, and the lingering effects in the workplace of centuries of American male chauvinism that represents, the focus of his well-meaning concern.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States