The Arizona Republic

Miss a payment? New rules could keep your power on

- Your Turn Abhay Padgaonkar Guest columnist Abhay Padgaonkar is a management consultant based in Phoenix and consumer advocate who has argued for stronger consumer protection­s in the utility disconnect­ion rules. Reach him at abhay.padgaonkar@gmail.com.

The old adage about not letting a serious crisis go to waste has turned out to be true in the Arizona Corporatio­n Commission’s recent decisions about utility disconnect­ion rules.

Inexplicab­ly, the disconnect­ion rules did not address summer heat or offer very many consumer protection­s until 2019. That glaring omission gave utilities the green light to make up their own rules, with APS cutting power more than 110,000 times for nonpayment in 2018.

But Stephanie Pullman’s death that year on a 107-degree day in August – after APS cut off her power for owing $51 – precipitat­ed the crisis. The commission adopted emergency rules within days of the news of her death becoming public in June 2019. APS soon disclosed at least four more incidents where power shutoff were known to impact the health of a customer.

It took another two years of back and forth, but the commission has finally advanced rules for the formal rulemaking process. The draft rules, which have been adopted by the commission but not finalized, strengthen protection­s, expand affordabil­ity and ensure flexibilit­y for the most vulnerable, but they must become permanent to retain those gains.

The draft rules set a temperatur­e limit of 95 degrees Fahrenheit for disconnect­ions as a new option for electric utilities. The other option would be to set the shutoff moratorium from June 1 through Oct.15.

Both will reliably protect at-risk customers from dangerous shutoffs on at least three times as many summer days as there are official heat warnings.

Shockingly, a couple of consumer groups, purporting to stand up to powerful interests, argued against the 95degree threshold, which if they were successful would have made it easier for utilities to turn off power during Arizona’s brutal summer.

They confused past-due balances with actual write-offs – that is, a general estimated sum versus exact and recorded losses. The latter represents a negligible 0.25% of the company’s total revenues, or an impact of about 30-35 cents on the average monthly bill.

They fearmonger­ed that longer moratorium­s would create unsustaina­bly high balances as an “unintended consequenc­e” — as if an occasional death or two was somehow a preferable consequenc­e.

Fortunatel­y, the commission had the good sense to ignore them.

Arizona is ranked the 10th worst state for residentia­l electricit­y burden. High rates make low-income households several times more susceptibl­e to shutoffs because a sizable portion of their household income goes toward energy costs.

The commission had already expanded low-income discount eligibilit­y by increasing the program cutoff from 150% to 200% of the federal poverty level.

Unfortunat­ely, the commission can address rates only in a formal rate case. In the pending APS rate case, commission staff has recommende­d a modest $55 million rate decrease. The Corporatio­n Commission must go far beyond that to make a meaningful dent in the high electricit­y rates relative to the household incomes in Arizona.

The $51 balance over which APS cut Ms. Pullman’s power caused an uproar – an amount APS’ then-CEO Don Brandt made every 30 seconds. The draft rules raise the minimum past-due balance to $300 for electricit­y shutoff.

The commission had already ordered utilities to apply customers’ deposit first and allowed customers to enter into a payment plan over at least eight months, with no down payment. The new rules further protect customers who may miss one payment or only make a partial payment within a 12month period by allowing them to remain on the payment plan.

It wasn’t clear whether APS had properly notified Pullman before disconnect­ing her. The commission has asked utilities to develop in-person notificati­on options and encouraged use of technology for delinquenc­y and shutoff warnings.

Chairwoman Lea Márquez Peterson and Commission­ers Sandra Kennedy and Anna Tovar must be commended for taking a major first step toward pulling the plug on dangerous disconnect­ion rules. But the true benefits will endure only if the commission makes them permanent.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States