The Arizona Republic

In Utah, Democrats get serious about democracy

- Mona Charen Mona Charen is policy editor of The Bulwark and host of the “Beg to Differ” podcast.

Fighting Republican authoritar­ianism means sometimes delaying political gratificat­ion.

The Utah Democratic Party did something extraordin­ary last week: They threw their support behind a Republican. Well, a former Republican, anyway. Evan McMullin, who ran for president as an independen­t in 2016, is now seeking to unseat Sen. Mike Lee.

At the Democratic Party convention, held at Cottonwood High School in Murray (don’t you love democracy?), some delegates were uncomforta­ble. One told the Deseret News that he “never imagined my fellow Democrats would disenfranc­hise me,” adding that “Democrats need to be on the ballot.” But most delegates were swayed by the arguments of former Democratic Rep. Ben McAdams, who vouched for McMullin’s integrity and urged that he would help “heal the divide” in Washington. Besides, he said, McMullin has a real path to victory. The Democrats agreed and, with 57% voting in favor, elected to join a coalition that also includes the United Utah Party to endorse McMullin.

Now, cards on the table, it isn’t as if any Democratic nominee would stand a ghost of a chance. Utah hasn’t elected a Democrat to the Senate in more than 50 years, and Republican­s outnumber Democrats in the state 5-to-1. But McMullin is a political unicorn – a former Republican, CIA veteran and conservati­ve who garnered 21% of the vote in Utah when he made his quixotic presidenti­al bid in 2016.

Lee was swept into office by the Tea Party wave of 2010. He defeated incumbent Republican Bob Bennett in the primary by arguing that Bennett had lost his edge after years in Washington. Lee claimed that he, by contrast, was a “constituti­onal conservati­ve.” His website boasts that he has “spent his career defending the fundamenta­l liberties of all Americans and advocating for America’s founding constituti­onal principles.”

Unless those principles conflict with his personal ambitions. Maybe that’s in the small print.

Lee was among the last holdouts at the GOP convention in 2016, hoping to deploy procedural rules to deny Trump the nomination. In July of that year, adverting to Trump’s “authoritar­ian” tendencies, he shot back at a MAGA radio host, “Don’t sit here and tell me that I have no reason to be concerned about

Donald Trump. … I mean we can get into the fact that he accused my best friend’s father of conspiring to kill JFK.”

Over the following years, like every other leading Republican except those you can list on two hands, Lee immolated his constituti­onal principles on a pyre. As Amanda Carpenter itemized, the recently revealed text messages to Donald Trump’s White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows reveal a senator not only willing to overlook a little authoritar­ianism now and again but also an active participan­t in a behind-thescenes effort to overturn a free and fair election. On Dec. 8, 2020, for example, Lee texted to Meadows that “If a very small handful of states were to have their legislatur­es appoint alternativ­e slates of delegates, there could be a path.” Lee, you see, wanted the coup to be by the book. If the states (only the ones Trump lost, of course) submitted alternate slates of electors, why, then, according to the Constituti­on and the Electoral Count Act (which Democrats should have repealed and replaced by now), the MAGA forces could stall and possibly prevent the certificat­ion of Biden’s victory. Lee later texted to Meadows

that he was on the phone “14 hours a day” discussing whether state legislator­s were going to submit “clean” slates for Trump. After the texts leaked, he told the Deseret News that “At no point in any of those was I engaging in advocacy. I wasn’t in any way encouragin­g them to do that. I just asked them a yes or no question.”

It didn’t occur to Mr. Constituti­onal Conservati­ve that phone calls from a United States senator to state legislator­s asking questions might be interprete­d as signals or even possibly as threats? He certainly knew that Trump was engaging in every possible ploy to overturn the election. What business did a Utah senator have even calling legislator­s from Pennsylvan­ia or Michigan? And he wasn’t troubled by the utter fallacious­ness of the election fraud claims, rejected by something like 63 courts, that would be the foundation of any effort to submit alternativ­e slates? That’s the nub of it. It was a lie – a blatant, stinking lie.

In October 2020, Lee famously tweeted “We’re not a democracy.” It’s a familiar conservati­ve talking point. We are a republic. True. A democratic republic. Article IV, Section 4 of the Constituti­on that Lee claims to revere guarantees to each state a “republican form of government.” A republican form of government depends utterly on votes being counted legally and properly. Otherwise, the Constituti­on’s guarantee becomes a dead letter, rather like the sham elections in Russia or Cuba. It seems that Lee wanted to use the Constituti­on as a fig leaf for a naked power grab. Yes, he ultimately voted to certify Biden’s victory, but only after granting the coup plot legitimacy with his backroom maneuverin­g.

The Utah Democratic Party has demonstrat­ed flexibilit­y, too rare a trait in today’s politics. Utahans now have a rare opportunit­y to strike a blow for democracy and the Constituti­on. A McMullin victory would signal that there are consequenc­es for betraying your oath and making a mockery of appeals to the Constituti­on.

 ?? PHOTOS: GETTY IMAGES ?? U.S. independen­t presidenti­al candidate Evan McMullin waits to speak to supporters at an election night party on Nov. 8, 2016, in Salt Lake City, Utah. Republican candidate Donald Trump was declared the winner in Utah late that evening.
PHOTOS: GETTY IMAGES U.S. independen­t presidenti­al candidate Evan McMullin waits to speak to supporters at an election night party on Nov. 8, 2016, in Salt Lake City, Utah. Republican candidate Donald Trump was declared the winner in Utah late that evening.
 ?? ?? Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee business meeting to vote on Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on April 4 on Capitol Hill.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee business meeting to vote on Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson on April 4 on Capitol Hill.
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States