The Arizona Republic

Sinema, Manchin won’t budge on filibuster

- EJ Montini Columnist Arizona Republic

Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema and West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin could save abortion rights for women in the United States.

But … they won’t.

For that to happen the senators would have to agree to abolish or alter the Senate’s filibuster rule in order to pass the rights guaranteed by Roe v. Wade into law.

But .. they won’t.

You recall how, back in January, Sinema and Manchin voted with Senate Republican­s to defeat a proposal that would have dropped the filibuster’s 60-vote threshold in order to pass voting rights legislatio­n.

Now, with the leak of the Supreme Court draft opinion overturnin­g Roe v. Wade the two Democrats will again be faced with choosing between the wishes of a majority of Americans or sticking with an arcane, much-altered Senate rule.

It’s another of those rare opportunit­ies in which a couple of politician­s have the ability to actually follow the will of the people.

But … they won’t.

Sinema issued a statement declaring her support for women’s abortion rights. But she also indicated that she wouldn’t change her mind about the filibuster.

She said:

“A woman’s health care choices should be between her, her family, and her doctor. Overturnin­g Roe v. Wade endangers the health and wellbeing of women in Arizona and across America.

“Protection­s in the Senate safeguardi­ng against the erosion of women’s access to health care have been used half-a-dozen times in the past ten years, and are more important now than ever.

“Throughout my time in Congress, I’ve always supported women’s access to health care, I’m a cosponsor of the Women’s Health Protection Act, and I’ll continue working with anyone to protect women’s ability to make decisions about their futures.”

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said he planned to hold a vote on codifying Roe v. Wade into law. It can’t pass unless the filibuster rule is altered.

And, yes, there’s no guarantee even if the filibuster rule is altered. But that’s the only chance.

When Sinema was arguing against changing the filibuster rule in the Senate prior to the voting rights vote, she said in part, “When one party needs only negotiate within itself, policy will inextricab­ly be pushed from the middle toward the extremes. I understand there are some on both sides of the aisle who prefer that outcome, but I do not. I know that Arizonans do not either … .”

Really, because that is exactly the

system Arizona has, and which Sinema was a part of for years.

I don’t recall an instance when she argued the Arizona Legislatur­e should institute a filibuster rule, something few states have. Now, however, she loves it. And the GOP loves her for loving it. Sinema knows very well that Republican­s on the state level (like Arizona) are passing oppressive abortion restrictio­n laws, just as they passed voter suppressio­n laws, on simple-majority, party-line votes.

She knows as well that she and Manchin could join a simple-majority vote in the Senate to stop them.

But … they won’t.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States