The Arizona Republic

Court gives Biggs, Gosar, Finchem a free pass

- EJ Montini Columnist Arizona Republic USA TODAY NETWORK

It almost seems quaint, now, how some of us actually believed that the people we elected to public office, and who swore an oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constituti­on of the United States,” actually meant it.

Even worse, the depth our naivete seems positively childlike, if not – How can I put this gently? – stupid, to have believed for one second that those same elected officials would be held answerable to that promise.

And that breaking it would have consequenc­es.

Penalties.

Punishment.

HA!

I could practicall­y hear members of Gov. Doug Ducey’s stacked Arizona Supreme Court giggling at the notion that they would call to account U.S. Reps. Andy Biggs and Paul Gosar, as well as state Rep. Mark Finchem for the aid and comfort they provided to the insurrecti­onists of Jan. 6.

The voting rights group Free Speech for the People filed suit in Arizona trying to keep Biggs, Gosar and Finchem off the ballot for violating Section 3 of the 14th Amendment of the Constituti­on.

It is commonly known as the disqualifi­cation clause.

It is simple to read and to understand, even for a bunch of judges. It says:

No person shall be a Senator or Representa­tive in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislatur­e, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constituti­on of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrecti­on or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Given their embrace of the Big Lie about election fraud, and their attempts to negate a duly certified election, and more, it seems like the case against the three Arizona politician­s might have been a slam dunk. And, who knows, the judges on the Arizona Supreme Court might even have agreed with that.

Perhaps that is why the court wouldn’t even allow any evidence against Biggs, Gosar and Finchem to be heard.

Instead, the court ruled that only Congress has the authority to disqualify elected officials based on having violated the 14th Amendment.

Roughly 725 private citizens have been arrested in conjunctio­n with storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

There have been many, many indictment­s and conviction­s. And a number of those individual­s were sentenced to jail.

Too bad the poor saps didn’t get themselves elected first.

Near as I can tell, none of the politician­s who stirred the pot that boiled over on Jan. 6 has suffered any consequenc­es.

And it wasn’t like anyone was trying to toss Biggs, Gosar and Finchem into the slammer — appealing as that thought might be to some people.

The lawsuit filed to keep them off the ballot simply wanted them disqualifi­ed from running for office for having “given aid or comfort,” as the 14th Amendment reads.

In a statement following the Arizona court’s decision Free Speech for the People said in part, “The Arizona Supreme Court’s decision betrays the fundamenta­l purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Insurrecti­onist Disqualifi­cation Clause and gives a pass to political violence as a tool for disrupting and overturnin­g free and fair elections.”

Not for everyone, of course. Some of the violent protestors from Jan. 6 are paying a price with fines, jail time and criminal records.

The Arizona court offered its kindly largesse only to Arizona’s elected officials, individual­s who swore an oath to “preserve, protect and defend the Constituti­on.”

In other words, the deserve a free pass.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States