The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Health mandate postponed

Employer penalties for not offering insurance plans delayed till 2015.

- By Tony Pugh McClatchy-Tribune

WASHINGTON — After months of conferring with fretful employers, the Obama administra­tion announced Tuesday that it will delay enforcemen­t of the Affordable Care Act’s so-called “employer mandate” until 2015.

A signature provision of the federal health care overhaul, the contentiou­s measure would have required companies with more than 50 fulltime employees to provide affordable health insurance or face a penalty of $2,000 per employee in 2014, when the law was set to be fully implemente­d.

Ninety-six percent of U.S. businesses have fewer than 50 employees and are already exempt from the mandate. The nonpartisa­n Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that 94 percent of companies with 50-199 employees already provide coverage — as do 98 percent of firms with 200 or more workers.

But those numbers don’t tell

the whole story. Employees who work 30 or more hours per week are considered “full time” under the law. But one-third of nearly 900 employers surveyed last month by the health care consulting firm Mercer don’t offer coverage to those employees.

These businesses and those with workforces hovering near the 50-employee threshold faced a host of important financial decisions about their health plan enrollment that had to be made by October, when employees begin choosing their coverage for 2014.

The deadlines have left companies large and small scrambling for answers and somewhat bewildered by the red tape, potential costs and tax implicatio­ns of the new provision.

In announcing the delayed enforcemen­t of the employer mandate, White House special adviser Valerie Jarrett said employers needed more time to comply with the new rules, which require extensive reporting about the specifics of employees’ coverage in order to assess the penalties.

“As we implement this law, we have and will continue to make changes as needed,” Jarrett said in a statement. “In our ongoing discussion­s with businesses we have heard that you need the time to get this right. We are listening.”

The delay is the latest and most significan­t move by the Obama administra­tion to slow enactment of the sprawling health care overhaul, which is seen as the major legislativ­e achievemen­t of the Obama presidency.

Although born of conservati­ve ideology, the law has been opposed from the outset by Republican­s and has only survived thanks to a surprising 2012 Supreme Court decision that upheld the law’s “individual mandate,” which requires that most Americans obtain health insurance or pay a penalty for noncomplia­nce.

News of the decision to delay the employer mandate sparked unanimous praise from the business community.

“The administra­tion has finally recognized the obvious — employers need more time and clarificat­ion of the rules of the road before implementi­ng the employer mandate,” said Randy Johnson, senior vice president of labor, immigratio­n and employee benefits at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Republican­s on Capitol Hill weren’t nearly as gracious about the administra­tion’s concession. House Speaker John Boehner called the law a “train wreck” that should be repealed.

“I hope the administra­tion recognizes the need to release American families from the mandates of this law as well,” said Boehner, R-Ohio.

Rep. Tom Price, a Republican from Roswell, in a statement released Tuesday night said the delay is “an admission that this law is simply too overreachi­ng, too intrusive, too unworkable and too destructiv­e to the American people.”

Price added, “House Republican­s stand with the vast majority of the American people in our opposition to this disastrous law, and we remain committed to its total and permanent repeal. It is bad for patients. It is bad for doctors. It is bad for workers. It is bad for job creators. It is bad for America.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States