The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Study: Okla.’s small quakes raise risk

Temblors linked to energy drilling in once-stable region.

- By Seth Borenstein SUE OGROCKI / AP 2011

SAN JOSE, CALIF. — Small earthquake­s shaking Oklahoma and southern Kansas daily and linked to energy drilling are dramatical­ly increasing the chance of bigger and more dangerous quakes, federal research indicates.

The once-stable region is now just as likely to see serious, damaging and potentiall­y harmful earthquake­s as the highest-risk places east of the Rockies, such as New Madrid, Mo., and Charleston, S.C., which have had major quakes in the past two centuries, the research found.

Still it’s a low risk — about a 1 in 2,500 years’ chance, according to geophysici­st William Ellsworth of the U.S. Geological Survey.

“To some degree we’ve dodged a bullet in Oklahoma,” Ellsworth said after a presentati­on last week to the American Associatio­n for the Advancemen­t of Science.

But, he added, “This is not to say we expect a large earthquake tomorrow.”

During the 90-minute session on humaninduc­ed earthquake­s, three quakes larger than 3.1 magnitude hit northern Oklahoma. Federal records show that since Jan. 1, Oklahoma has had nearly 200 quakes big enough for people to feel. The quakes started to increase in 2008 and made dramatic jumps in frequency in June 2013 and again in February 2014, Workers inspect the damage at St. Gregory’s University in Shawnee, Okla., after two earthquake­s hit the area in less than 24 hours. Quakes started to increase in 2008 and made dramatic jumps in June 2013. Ellsworth said.

They are mostly in areas with energy drilling, often hydraulic fracturing, a process known as fracking. Many studies have linked the increase in small quakes to the process of injecting wastewater deep undergroun­d because it changes pressure and triggers dormant faults.

Until now, those quakes were mostly thought of as nuisances and not really threats. But Ellsworth’s continuing study, which is not yet published, shows the mere increase in the number of tiny temblors raises the risk of earthquake­s that scientists consider major hazards. Those are generally above magnitude 5 with older buildings and magnitude 6 for modern ones, Ellsworth said.

“The more small earthquake­s we have it just simply increases the odds we’re going to have a more damaging event,” he said.

A 2011 earthquake in Prague, Okla., was 5.7 magnitude, causing some damage and injuring two people. Some studies concluded it was a side effect of the drilling process, but other scientists are not convinced.

Experts at the science session said Ellsworth’s finding of a higher risk for big quakes makes sense.

“We are worried about this, no question about it,” said Rex Buchanan, interim director of the Kansas Geological Survey.

Not all states with fracking and wastewater injection are seeing increased quakes and not all those with increased quakes, such as Texas and Ohio, are at a higher risk for major quakes, Ellsworth said. Arkansas and Ohio, for example, are now seeing fewer manmade quakes, he said.

Much depends on geology and how the wastewater is injected, said Stanford University geophysics professor Mark Zoback. He said industry and regulators can be smarter about where they inject wastewater and where they do not, and can avoid many problems.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States