The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Another word for ’illegal alien’

Text goes here xxyxxxy xyx xyx xyxyxyxxy xyxyx.

- By Jasmine Aguilera

WASHINGTON — Melissa Padilla was doing research on immigratio­n in her university library at Dartmouth College when she noticed the term “illegal aliens” popping up again and again. The more she saw it, the angrier she became.

“This term, and the way people used it to criminaliz­e the choices our parents made in order to provide us with better lives, completely detracts from the brave choices and obstacles we overcame in order to survive,” said Padilla, 26, who was an undocument­ed immigrant for 15 years after her parents brought her to the United States from Mexico when she was 7. “I’m not illegal. I’m a survivor that continues to work toward a better future.”

Padilla joined with Dartmouth students at the Coalition for Immigratio­n Reform, Equality and Dreamers, and they have spent more than two years petitionin­g the Library of Congress to remove “illegal alien” from its subject headings.

As a result, the library began the relabeling process last week, after agreeing with Padilla’s argument that “alien” and “illegal alien” are pejorative terms. The library will replace the term with “noncitizen­s” and “unauthoriz­ed immigratio­n,” setting a precedent that may be followed by other libraries on a global scale.

But that decision — at a time when immigratio­n has become a big topic in the presidenti­al campaign and at the Supreme Court — has ignited an angry response from conservati­ve lawmakers who accuse the library of abandoning the letter of the law to pander to immigrant rights’ advocates.

“There is no other way to put this: the library has bowed to the political pressure of the moment,” Republican­s wrote in a May 10 letter to David S. Mao, the acting librarian of Congress. The letter was written by Reps. Lamar Smith and John Culberson, both of Texas, and Sens. Ted Cruz of Texas and Jeff Sessions of Alabama, Republican­s who have long advocated stricter enforcemen­t of immigratio­n laws.

The House added a provision on June 10 to the legislativ­e branch appropriat­ions bill that would require the library to retain terminolog­y used in federal law, including “alien.” Congress will move forward with the appropriat­ions process when it reconvenes in September. In the meantime, the library will stop using “illegal alien,” although library officials are aware they may hWaveItNo reDveOrseW­theiSr changes if the provision becomes law.

Gayle Osterberg, the communicat­ions director of the Library of Congress, said this was the first time Congress has intervened with the routine relabeling, which the library does every year to keep thousands of catalogs current. Osterberg noted that there was no legislativ­e opposition, for example, when “Negro” and “retard” were removed from subject headings.

Padilla, who became a permanent resident in 2012 after her father became a naturalize­d citizen, said she believes that “illegal alien” is used to demean Mexican immigrants specifical­ly, regardless of legal status. Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas, agreed with her.

“When ugly, belittling names are used to describe groups of people, those terms can make discrimina­tion seem OK,” Castro said on the House floor on June 9, in an effort to stop the provision from being included in the bill.

Castro, whose grandmothe­r was a Mexican immigrant, also helped write a letter, along with the Congressio­nal HispanDic,

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States