The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

5 states sue over transgende­r rules

Suit: Rules could force doctors to act against their beliefs.

- By Paul J. Weber

AUSTIN, TEXAS — Texas and four other Republican-led states filed another lawsuit Tuesday seeking to roll back the Obama administra­tion’s efforts to strengthen transgende­r rights, saying new federal nondiscrim­ination health rules could force doctors to act contrary to their medical judgment or religious beliefs.

The lawsuit is the second in recent months in which conservati­ve states have sued over federal efforts to defend transgende­r rights.

Social conservati­ves claimed victory Sunday when a federal judge in Texas halted an Obama administra­tion directive requiring public schools to let transgende­r students use bathrooms consistent with their gender identity. Now they’re asking that same court to block new regulation­s intended to ban discrimina­tion against transgende­r persons by doctors, hospitals and insurers.

The latest lawsuit contends that the rules, which were finalized in May, could force doctors to help with gender transition contrary to their religious beliefs or medical judgment. Transgende­r rights advocates called that a far-fetched hypothetic­al, saying a person seeking such a transforma­tion would not choose a doctor who lacked suitable experience and expertise.

Joining Texas in the lawsuit are Wisconsin, Kentucky, Nebraska and Kansas, along with the Christian Medical and Dental Associatio­n and Franciscan Alliance, an Indiana-based network of religious hospitals.

The regulation­s discard “independen­t medical judgment and a physician’s duty to his or her patient’s permanent well-being and replaces them with rigid commands,” the lawsuit states.

Jillian Weiss, executive director of the Transgende­r Legal Defense and Education Fund, said the new federal rules were groundbrea­king and pointed out that other states already had similar protection­s. Ten states and Washington, D.C., require private insurers to cover transgende­r health care, while six states plus the nation’s capital cover such services through their Medicaid programs, according to advocates.

“The only thing a doctor is obliged to do is treat all patients, including trans patients, with dignity and respect and to make treatment decisions free from bias,” Weiss said. “If a doctor has a sound, evidence-based, medical reason to delay transition care for a specific patient, that would be respected under the regulation­s.”

The Obama administra­tion finalized the regulation­s around the time it issued its directive to public schools regarding transgende­r students. Thirteen states signed on to fight that directive, including three involved in the latest lawsuit, and won a temporary injunction this week from U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor.

O’Connor ruled that the federal anti-discrimina­tion law known as Title IX “is not ambiguous” about sex being defined as “the biological and anatomical difference­s between male and female students as determined at their birth.” He also said federal officials skirted rules requiring a chance for input and feedback before new rules were implemente­d.

The Justice Department has not said whether it will appeal the ruling.

 ?? ELAINE THOMPSON / AP ?? The lawsuit is the second in recent months in which conservati­ve states have sued over federal efforts to defend transgende­r rights.
ELAINE THOMPSON / AP The lawsuit is the second in recent months in which conservati­ve states have sued over federal efforts to defend transgende­r rights.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States