The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Should police officer be allowed to fly Confederat­e flag?

- By David Ibata davidibata­2015@gmail.com Here are some responses: — Adele Paule, Decatur BILL BANKS FOR THE AJC — Ginger Marine (no city given) — Juli Fleming, Decatur

To a former Roswell police sergeant and her supporters, the Confederat­e battle flag that flew in front of her house last summer honored Southern heritage and the memory of her late husband.

To others, it’s the emblem of the slave-owning society that fought a war against the United States in the 19th century, and a symbol that’s been embraced by modern-day white supremacis­ts.

Roswell dismissed Sgt. Silvia Cotriss in July for conduct unbecoming a police officer after someone reported the Confederat­e banner flying in front of her Woodstock home — reportedly, with a Roswell police car parked in the driveway.

Cotriss contested the firing in a federal lawsuit filed Dec. 14 in U.S. District Court, Atlanta.

This summer, in an interview with the AJC, Cotriss said she hadn’t realized some found the flag offensive.

“If I knew it offended someone, my friends, my family, I wouldn’t do it,” Cotriss said. “Police officers have to adjust a lot of things in our lives, and for 20 years my whole life has been about making change and being held to a higher standard. We take an oath to help and protect people, so we can’t have a private life that’s really bad.”

Cotriss’ suit, filed by attorney David Ates, contends flying the flag was a constituti­onally protected exercise of free speech and did not relate to her job or job duties as a police officer. (The suit also disputes that Cotriss had a Roswell police vehicle at home at the time.)

Roswell officials have declined to comment on the pending litigation.

Is it within a police officer’s First Amendment rights to fly a Confederat­e flag? Or was Roswell justified in firing her? Tell what you think.

Send comments by email to communityn­ews@ajc.com. They may be published in print and/ or online.

The proposal was surprising for several reasons, not the least because of years-long controvers­y following the last time City Schools Decatur changed formats in 2004-05. That year the system changed from a k-5 model to the current k-3/ 4-5, although that was also accompanie­d by the closing of two elementary schools (since reopened). The task force actually presented two options, though its members specifical­ly favored the first:

In the K-2/ 3-5 configurat­ion, K-2 buildings would include Clairemont, Glennwood, Winnona Park, Westcheste­r and College Heights, which would be renovated to hold 293 students. The 3-5 buildings would be at Oakhurst, Fifth Avenue and a new structure at the recently purchased property on Talley Street and South Columbia Drive (the Renfroe and Decatur High structures remain unchanged).

The current structure overall remains the same except a sixth elementary—at College Heights— gets added to the mix and second 4/ 5 Academy get built on Talley Street.

As for returning to the old pre 2004 structure, CSD Chief Operating Officer Noel Maloof said recently,“the k-5 is inefficien­t in that we can’t support that financiall­y.” Ultimately the board will make the final decision, presumably after a series of community meetings. We asked which option you favor or if, as the school board may choose, have a third original alternativ­e of your own. Seven years ago our system went to a (largely) pre-k-1, 2-4, 5-6, 7-8, 9-12 configurat­ion. This has been very successful, especially at the 5-6, 7-8 levels. We have one school that is pre-k-4. I have been surprised at how well, generally, it has worked. Go back to K-5. That way all elementary kids can walk to school, you save a $1 million a year in busing and the longer grade spans are better for kids. You also get better parent participat­ion and leadership opportunit­ies for fourth and fifth graders. CSD has spent millions renovating, re-renovating and re-re-rerenovati­ng. I wonder how much community input Dr. Dude and Mr. Maloof have gathered. Decatur has a positive history of parent involvemen­t, and they seem to value that, by using it as a defense of taking 3rd graders out of their neighborho­ods. I hope that presenting the task force results right before winter holidays was NOT intentiona­l timing. Why didn’t they or your article say which option is the cheapest? Is it K-2 + 3-5? I mourn the days of K-5, where my older son formed his lifelong friendship­s, and diversity is better served. My younger son is so happy at The Museum School of Avondale Estates, a K-8 program, and community involvemen­t is outstandin­g.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States