The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Senate takes 1st repeal vote on health law

Still unclear in Congress: Repeal and replace, or repeal and delay?

- By Tamar Hallerman tamar.hallerman@ajc.com and Misty Williams mwilliams@ajc.com

WASHINGTON — Congress could gut Obamacare within weeks following the Senate’s vote — just before 1:30 a.m. Thursday — on a budget bill that clears the way for repeal.

The bill aims for four committees in the House and Senate to write legislatio­n by Jan. 27 that would collective­ly dismantle the Affordable Care Act. GOP leaders are hoping to tee up a vote on the proposal shortly thereafter. A small but growing number of Republican­s, however, was wary of moving without a replacemen­t, a concern that could jeopardize the Jan. 27 deadline.

Experts have warned that repealing the law without a replacemen­t could cause massive disruption to the nation’s individual health insurance market and millions of Americans could lose their coverage.

In Georgia, more than 480,000 people have already selected Obamacare coverage for 2017 with 20 days still left to go until the end of open enrollment. They join the more than 11.5 million Americans who have signed up so far for coverage through the federal and state insurance exchanges.

Obama officials have assured consumers those health plans will remain good through the end of this year.

But what comes after that is anyone’s guess.

Repeal and delay?

Repeal is a perilous task for GOP leaders.

They have waited seven years for a chance to put their own stamp on health care policy and replace a law they have long vilified. But they are now responsibl­e for delivering on a bold and substantia­l campaign pledge with little margin for error.

Divisions within the party start with whether to repeal the law right away or wait until there’s a replacemen­t ready. A handful of Senate Republican­s has come forward during the past two weeks to express reservatio­ns about moving too quickly.

The GOP is unified on the broad principle that their alternativ­e won’t force people or companies into things they don’t want to do. But the party has not coalesced around a single replacemen­t plan.

Georgia Republican Johnny Isakson said in a speech Wednesday that it is “unsustaina­ble and impractica­l and it’s wrong for us to say we’re going to repeal Obamacare without replacing it with a plan that we know works.”

Sen. David Perdue of Georgia, meanwhile, supports repealing now, even if a substitute isn’t immediatel­y available.

“I know what’s happening right now behind the scenes, and that’s an active conversati­on about the replacemen­t pieces,” Perdue said in an interview.

“I’m quite anxious to have an active and open debate because we’re going to have to have Democrat cooperatio­n to actually get some of the replacemen­ts done,” Perdue added.

Democrats have said they won’t aid the repeal effort, although some moderates have indicated they’d be willing to help negotiate a replacemen­t.

Meanwhile, President-elect Donald Trump on Wednesday told reporters his new administra­tion would file a plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act shortly after Tom Price, the Georgia congressma­n Trump nominated to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, is confirmed by the Senate.

“We’re going to be submitting as soon as our secretary is approved, almost simultaneo­usly, shortly thereafter, a plan,” Trump said during a press conference Wednesday. “It will be repeal and replace. It will be various segments, you understand, but will most likely be on the same day or the same week, but probably the same day. Could be the same hour.”

The first of two Senate confirmati­on hearings for Price is scheduled for Wednesday.

‘There’s too much uncertaint­y’

If confirmed as expected, Price will have extraordin­ary power to shape the GOP’s replacemen­t plan.

The Georgian is expected to take an active role in helping Republican­s get on the same page, given his close relationsh­ip with Speaker Paul Ryan and credential­s as a doctor and longtime lawmaker who has authored an Obamacare replacemen­t plan of his own.

In Georgia, roughly 85 percent of people with Obamacare coverage receive tax subsidies to help them afford the premiums. Without that aid, many would likely lose their health insurance.

Right now, it’s too soon for insurers and health providers to make any major decisions, said Bill Custer, a health care expert at Georgia State University.

“There’s too much uncertaint­y,” Custer said. “The best move is to do nothing at this point. You just have no idea what’s going to happen in the next couple of weeks.”

None of the replacemen­t plans proposed by Republican­s comes close to covering the same number of people that the Affordable Care Act has, he added.

“Right now, we’ve seen a lot of high-level rhetoric, and the effect is going to be in the details,” Custer said.

Medicaid expansion in Georgia?

The repeal vote also places into question what — if anything — Georgia lawmakers will do to extend health coverage to the state’s roughly 1.4 million uninsured residents. Georgia has the third highest rate of uninsured in the nation, behind only Texas and Alaska, Census Bureau data shows.

In recent months, state Republican­s increasing­ly began to push to expand Medicaid under the health care law, albeit in a more conservati­ve-friendly way than traditiona­l expansion. Expanding Medicaid as is would extend health coverage to an estimated 600,000 low-income Georgians and bring in billions of dollars in new federal funding to help support the state’s ailing rural health care system.

But after the Nov. 8 election, the Medicaid expansion discussion ground to a halt.

Top state Republican­s have said they hope to play a role in how Congress shapes a replacemen­t for Obamacare. GOP Senate leaders said last week that the creation of a “repeal Obamacare” task force will be a top priority under the Gold Dome this legislativ­e session.

Georgia has very strong connection­s in Washington, said state Sen. Renee Unterman, R-Buford, who is a member of the task force.

“My main goal is not to be regressive but to be progressiv­e,” she said. “We’re glad the system’s changing. We just want to be a part of it.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States