The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Some agencies told to be silent as administra­tion moves in

Some employees say ‘gag order’ just standard practice.

- By Michael Biesecker and Seth Borenstein

WASHINGTON — The Trump administra­tion has ordered a freeze on federal grant spending at several government agencies, from the Environmen­tal Protection Agency to the Department of Health and Human Services, followed by memos telling employees not to send out news releases or to create social media posts, blog entries or official website content, and to consult with senior officials before speaking to the news media.

Such memos landed this week at the EPA, Health and Human Services, Interior Department and Department of Agricultur­e in a broad halt to external communicat­ions while the Trump administra­tion struggles to put political appointees into position. Small flare-ups of communicat­ions — apparently in dissent — appeared on Twitter, but they were quickly stopped.

The Twitter posts of the social media division of the Badlands National Park broadcasti­ng the threat of climate change became something of a cause célèbre on the left before they disappeare­d from the platform on Tuesday.

Longtime employees at three of the agencies — including some career environmen­tal regulators who conceded that they remained worried about what President Donald Trump might do on policy matters — said such orders were not much different from those delivered by the Obama administra­tion as it shifted policies from the departing White House of George W. Bush. They called reactions to the agency memos overblown.

“I’ve lived through many transition­s, and I don’t think this is a story,” said a senior EPA career official. “I don’t think it’s fair to call it a gag order. This is standard practice. And the move with regard to the grants, when a new administra­tion comes in, you run things by them before you update the website.”

But environmen­tal advocates and Democrats took advantage of the moves, noting that they appeared to target agencies that focus on environmen­tal protection and scientific research, and calling them a chilling signal that the Trump administra­tion intends to suppress communicat­ion about science and environmen­tal policy.

Environmen­talists also criticized what appeared to be a Twitter war between some Interior Department employees and their new bosses, as the agency appeared to delete Twitter posts by National Park Service employees that highlighte­d the smaller attendance at Trump’s inaugurati­on than at Barack Obama’s 2009 inaugurati­on, as well as facts about climate change.

Rebellious posts on social media became so plentiful from so many obscure sites that the management of the Interior Department appeared powerless to find them all.

But it is far from clear how realistic the response has been. The agricultur­e department memo to employees came from Tom Vilsack, an Obama administra­tion appointee and the outgoing agricultur­e secretary. Its “gag order” was measured in tone.

“In order for the department to deliver unified, consistent messages, it’s important for the office of the secretary to be consulted on media inquiries and proposed responses to questions related to legislatio­n, budgets, hot-button policy issues and regulation­s,” Vilsack, a former Democratic governor of Iowa, wrote. “Policy-related statements should not be made to the press without notifying or consulting with the office of the secretary.”

A spokesman for the EPA described the freeze on grants as a short-term pause in order for the new administra­tion to review them.

“They’re not being canceled; they’re delayed so we can review the contracts,” said Douglas Ericksen, the spokesman.

Michael Young, the acting deputy secretary of the Agricultur­e Department, who has worked as a career civil servant in the department for 33 years, wrote a memo to employees guiding them to consult the secretary’s office when responding to news media inquiries, and he said the memo was little different from the one issued during the transition to Obama’s administra­tion.

“This memo is not some sort of creative writing exercise,” he said. “This is almost exactly what was issued eight years ago. I just updated it a bit.”

Young said that the rationale for the memo was that the more than 100,000 people working for the department had been working for eight years under a set of priorities and policies that would now change.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States