The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Pipeline exec compares Dakota protesters to terrorists

- By Matthew Daly

WASHINGTON — A top executive at the company building the controvers­ial Dakota Access pipeline on Wednesday compared pipeline opponents to terrorists.

Joey Mahmoud, executive vice president of Texas-based Energy Transfer Partners, said protesters have “assaulted numerous pipeline personnel,” destroyed millions of dollars’ worth of constructi­on equipment and even fired a pistol at law enforcemen­t during months of demonstrat­ions against the 1,200-mile pipeline, which will carry North Dakota oil to an Illinois terminal.

Mahmoud said in written testimony to Congress that the protest movement “induced individual­s to break into and shut down pump stations on four operationa­l pipelines. Had these actions been undertaken by foreign nationals, they could only be described as acts of terrorism.”

Mahmoud omitted the comment about terrorism as he read his testimony aloud to a House energy subcommitt­ee Wednesday. Harold Frazier, the chairman of the Cheyenne River Sioux, one of two tribes suing to stop the project, called Mahmoud’s comments unfair to the protesters.

“The majority of them are there in prayer,” said Frazier. “From what I’ve seen (law enforcemen­t officers) are the terrorists.”

Officers have used rubber bullets, tear gas and water sprays against protesters during clashes in southern North Dakota near the pipeline route, Frazier said, adding that he personally has been hit by rubber bullets and tear gas.

Mahmoud, the pipeline executive, also blasted the Obama administra­tion, which twice delayed the project last year.

“The Department of the Interior, and most likely senior members of the White House staff, interfered deeply and inappropri­ately in the waning stages of the regulatory process,” he told lawmakers. “Even a company as large as Energy Transfer is helpless in the face of a government which will neither obey nor enforce the law.”

Mahmoud called the delays “politicall­y motivated actions” that were “accompanie­d by a host of half-truths and misreprese­ntations in both social and mainstream media.”

Mahmoud also targeted the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, whose reservatio­n lies near the pipeline’s route and who say the pipeline threatens their water supply and tribal artifacts.

The company reached out to the tribe more than two years ago but has been continuall­y rebuffed, Mahmoud said, maintainin­g that the project poses little threat to drinking water. The pipeline will be at least the 15th to cross the Missouri River, will employ state-of-the-art technology and will be buried more than 90 feet below the river, he said.

“To cast this as a dispute about protection of water resources is, quite simply, at variance with the facts, and it ignores universall­y accepted scientific and engineerin­g practices,” he said.

Chad Harrison, a councilman at-large for the Standing Rock Sioux, said the pipeline company and the government ignored the tribe’s concerns for almost three years before the Obama administra­tion paused the project last September. On Dec. 4, then-assistant Army secretary for civil works, Jo-Ellen Darcy, declined to issue an easement, saying a broader environmen­tal study was warranted.

The Army Corps, which regulates pipeline crossings of the river, reversed course and issued the easement after President Donald Trump too office.

“To be clear, the tribe does not oppose economic developmen­t, energy independen­ce or protecting our national security,” Harrison said. “What we oppose is developmen­t that is undertaken without our consent and in such a way that our community, our people, our cultural sites and our natural resources are put at the most risk. We are the ones who will pay the cost when something goes wrong.”

Mahmoud declined to comment after Wednesday’s hearing.

A federal judge on Monday refused to stop constructi­on on the last stretch of the pipeline, which could be operationa­l as soon as next month.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg ruled that as long as oil isn’t flowing through the pipeline, there is no imminent harm to the two tribes. Another hearing is scheduled on Feb. 27.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States