The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

AT THE GOLD DOME

Ga. House OKs bill critics say erodes victims’ rights.

- By Rhonda Cook rcook@ajc.com

The rights of sexual assault victims clashed with those of the accused as the Georgia House on Wednesday approved a bill that would change the way colleges handle allegation­s of rape on campus.

The measure ultimately passed 115-55 following nearly two hours of heated debate.

Both sides argued they had the best interests of Georgia’s college students in mind — the victims as well as those accused of attacking them.

“This is about safe campuses for all of our students. This is about moms and dads. This is about their children, their education and careers. This is legislatio­n that protects children on college campuses,” said bill sponsor Rep. Earl Ehrhart, R-Powder Springs.

“It’s a balance between the rights of the victim and the rights of the accused,” he said, repeatedly telling colleagues that under the current system those accused of sexual assault don’t enjoy due process rights when the allegation­s are handled by college and university officials who can suspend or expel them

Despite Ehrhart’s assurances, Rep. Mary Margaret Oliver, D-Decatur, said still thought House Bill 51 - though different from its original version - would hurt victims assaulted on college campuses.

“This bill — although it started out as sledge hammer in the delicate process of the way we treat sexual assault victims — is still a hammer on victims’ rights,” Oliver said. “I’m glad we put down the sledge hammer. But I urge you not to proceed with a hammer into very difficult situations.” She was joined by others. “I refuse to take part in further victimizat­ion of (sexual assault survivors),” Rep. David Dreyer, D-Atlanta.

The bills has been opposed by a group of sexual assault victims, who have been at the Capitol to lobby against the measure.

“We have a system that all too often fails the victim. We can’t send a message to (rape) survivors that we don’t believe them. They hear that over and over and over again,” said Rep. Scott. Holcomb, D-Atlanta.

The bill is a response to a letter the U.S. Department of Education sent in 2011 advising colleges and universiti­es that Title IX federal law required them to punish sexual assault or risk losing federal funds.

In the years that followed, Ehrhart said, he heard from parents forced to spend tens of thousands of dollars defending their sons in administra­tive investigat­ions sparked by reports of sexual assaults. He said some of these young men lost their college careers and saw their hopes of profession­al success evaporate even though they may not have faced criminal charges.

The proposed bill says colleges and universiti­es must report to law enforcemen­t any allegation­s of sexual assault but they cannot identify victims without their consent. It also says a victim cannot be forced to cooperate with law enforcemen­t.

HB51 prohibits universiti­es from conducting a investigat­ion until law enforcemen­t is finished because of the risk that college officials would destroy evidence needed for a possible criminal cases, Ehrhart said.

He said defense attorneys have told him “the best friend of a rapist is this Title IX administra­tor.

“The perpetrato­r isn’t put in jail. He’s free to do it again,” Ehrhart said.

“It’s a balance between the rights of the victim and the rights of the accused.”

Opposition to the bill focused on how much power a sexual assault victim retained.

Many victims of sexual assault never report the crime to law enforcemen­t but instead have the school investigat­e and punish the offender. The option is appealing to victims because the burden of proof is lower and privacy protection­s greater. Schools may suspend or expel a student if they are found responsibl­e. An AJC investigat­ion found that prosecutor­s rarely bring charges in campus rape cases.

Ehrhart said college officials can take interim steps like moving the victim to different classes or different dorms to put distance between their and her accused attacker until the matter is resolved. But preemptive­ly moving the attacker was prohibited because it could be considered discipline.

 ?? BOB ANDRES / BANDRES@AJC.COM ?? Rep. Earl Ehrhart, R-Powder Springs, who presented House Bill 51, watches as the vote on his bill comes in. The House voted 115-55 to approve HB 51, commonly referred to as the campus rape bill. Critics say the bill erodes victims’ rights.
BOB ANDRES / BANDRES@AJC.COM Rep. Earl Ehrhart, R-Powder Springs, who presented House Bill 51, watches as the vote on his bill comes in. The House voted 115-55 to approve HB 51, commonly referred to as the campus rape bill. Critics say the bill erodes victims’ rights.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States